Question : 106.Sanchez, Inc. uses process costing. Equivalent units for its Molding : 1302714

Economics

106.Sanchez, Inc. uses process costing. Equivalent units for its Molding Department totaled 18,600 during January for conversion costs. 15,000 units were transferred out of the Molding Department to the Finishing Department during the month. If the items remaining in ending Work in Process inventory are 40% complete as to conversion costs and 80% complete as to materials, how many physical units are there in ending Work in Process inventory in the Molding Department?

A.24,000 units

B.15,000 units

C.4,500 units

D.9,000 units

107.Wilson Carver Knives uses process costing. In its Cutting Department, all the materials are added at the beginning of the process and conversion costs are added evenly during the processing. During the first month of operations, the Cutting Department transferred 78,000 units to the Packing Department. The Cutting Department’s ending Work in Process inventory consisted of 3,800 units that were 40% complete. What are the equivalent units for materials and for conversion costs in the Cutting Department, respectively?

A.81,800 and 81,800 units

B.81,800 and 79,520 units

C.79,520 and 79,520 units

D.78,000 and 81,800 units

108.The Packaging Department is the final processing department in Hector Manufacturing. During March, 5,100 units were transferred into the Packaging Department from the Finishing Department and 4,700 units were transferred out to Finished Goods. There were 900 units in ending inventory in the Packaging Department. How many equivalent units are used to calculate the cost per equivalent unit for transferred-in costs in the Packaging Department?

A.4,700 units

B.5,600 units

C.5,200 units

D.5,100 units

109.The Cooking Department is the third department at Winslow Rice Production. During February, there were 8,000 units of beginning inventory in the Cooking Department, and 50,000 units were transferred in from the prior process. There were 4,000 units in ending inventory. The transferred-in cost in the beginning inventory was $80,000, with $900,000 of additional cost for units transferred in during the month. What is the cost per equivalent unit for transferred-in cost?

A.$15.52

B.$16.90

C.$18.15

D.There is not enough information to answer the question

110.The Mixing Department is the first processing department in Sweet N’ Plenty. The beginning Work in Process inventory had a value of $17,700 for conversion costs and additional conversion costs of $214,000 were incurred by the department during the month. There were 2,000 units in ending Work in Process inventory that were 10% complete and 66,000 units were transferred out of the department during the month. The company uses process costing. What is the cost per equivalent unit for conversion costs?

A.$3.50

B.$34.07

C.$3.41

D.There is not enough information to answer the question

111.Riley Company uses process costing. Its Forming Department had 10,000 equivalent units of production for direct materials and 7,500 equivalent units of production for conversion costs in May. There were 2,000 units in beginning inventory. Costs were incurred in May as follows:

Direct MaterialConversionTotal

Beginning Work in Process $ 3,000 $ 1,500 $ 4,500

Incurred during May 12,800 15,500 28,300

Total $15,800 $17,000 $32,800

What is the total cost per equivalent unit?

A.$3.85

B.$3.28

C.$4.37

D.$1.87

112.Sullivan Company uses process costing. Its Sewing Department had an equivalent cost per unit for direct materials of $0.75 and for conversion costs of $0.50 during May. There were 20,000 units completed and transferred to Finished Goods, and 8,000 units in ending Work in Process inventory that were 100% complete with respect to direct material and 75% complete with respect to conversion costs. What was the amount transferred to Finished Goods?

A.$25,000

B.$34,000

C.$9,000

D.$6,000

113.Fox Lane Gifts uses process costing and determined an equivalent cost per unit of $0.90 for direct materials and $0.70 for conversion costs during May. There were 9,000 units completed and transferred to Finished Goods, and 1,200 units in ending Work in Process Inventory that were 100% complete with respect to direct materials and 40% complete with respect to conversion costs. What was the ending Work in Process inventory?

A.$6,636

B.$768

C.$1,416

D.$15,816

114.Realm Company uses process costing and had an equivalent cost of $2.30 per unit for direct materials and $1.80 per unit for conversion costs during May in its Rolling Department. There were 11,600 units completed and transferred to Finished Goods, and 1,000 units in ending Work in Process inventory that were 80% complete with respect to direct material and 60% complete with respect to conversion costs. How much is the cost of completed goods transferred to Finished Goods from the Rolling Department?

A.$2,920

B.$47,560

C.$50,480

D.$53,360

115.Realm Company uses process costing and had an equivalent cost of $2.30 per unit for direct materials and $1.80 per unit for conversion costs during May in its Rolling Department. There were 11,600 units completed and transferred to finished goods, and 1,000 units in ending Work in Process inventory for the Rolling Department that were 80% complete with respect to direct material and 60% complete with respect to conversion costs. How much is ending Work in Process in the Rolling Department?

A.$47,560

B.$50,480

C.$2,920

D.$3,220

Continue to order Get a quote

July 1, 2023

Please use the following articles, professor feedback, rubric and attached PowerPoint

Assignment: Evidence-Based Capstone Project, Part 6: Disseminating Results

The dissemination of EBP results serves multiple important roles. Sharing results makes the case for your decisions. It also adds to the body of knowledge, which creates opportunities for future practitioners. By presenting results, you also become an advocate for EBP, creating a culture within your organization or beyond that informs, educates, and promotes the effective use of EBP.

To Prepare:

Review the final PowerPoint presentation you submitted in Module 5, and make any necessary changes based on the feedback you have received and on lessons you have learned throughout the course.
Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.

To Complete:

Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project.

Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.
Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.

Articles

Membrive-Jiménez, M. J., Pradas-Hernández, L., Suleiman-Martos, N., Vargas-Román, K., Cañadas-De la Fuente, G. A., Gomez-Urquiza, J. L., & De la Fuente-Solana, E. I. (2020). Burnout in Nursing Managers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Related Factors, Levels and Prevalence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11). https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.3390/ijerph17113983

Chiara Dall’Ora, Jane Ball, Maria Reinius, & Peter Griffiths. (2020). Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. Human Resources for Health, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9

Adams, A., Hollingsworth, A., & Osman, A. (2019). The Implementation of a Cultural Change Toolkit to Reduce Nursing Burnout and Mitigate Nurse Turnover in the Emergency Department. JEN: Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(4), 452.

Suleiman-Martos, N., Gomez-Urquiza, J. L., Aguayo-Estremera, R., Cañadas-De La Fuente, G. A., De La Fuente-Solana, E. I., & Albendín-García, L. (2020). The effect of mindfulness training on burnout syndrome in nursing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Of Advanced Nursing. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1111/jan.14318

Professor's Feedback

Nice title slide.

Slide 2: "They aspire..." "Their vision...." "Their mission...." WHO is "they/their"?

The current problem is not completely defined. There are no notes pages. Scope of the problem is not clearly defined. There are only two sources listed-what about the four studies that should be critiqued here?

For the tables, share results not process. What did you learn about your topic specifically from the tables? This is the evidence to support the change you want to make.

The elements required are incomplete. Be sure to review the rubric each week, and to fully describe and discuss as required. Thanks for your hard work this week. I appreciate your efforts. I look forward to more information next week.

RUBRIC

Part 6: Disseminating Results

Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project:

· Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.
· Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.--

Levels of Achievement:Excellent 81 (81.00%) - 90 (90.00%)The narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the evidence-based project.

The narrated presentation accurately and clearly explains in detail how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples.

The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides a justification that details the selection of this dissemination strategy that is fully supported by specific and relevant examples.

The narrated presentation provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation.Good 72 (72.00%) - 80 (80.00%)The narrated presentation adequately summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the evidence-based project.

The narrated presentation accurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; some specific examples may be provided.

The narrated presentation accurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by specific examples.

The narrated presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation.Fair 63 (63.00%) - 71 (71.00%)The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the evidence-based project.

The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; inaccurate or vague examples may be provided.

The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by inaccurate or vague examples.

The narrated presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 62 (62.00%)The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the evidence-based project or is missing. The narrated presentation is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the evidence-based project or is missing.

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, no examples are provided, or it is missing.

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy, no examples are provided, or it is missing.

The narrated presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained or is missing. The presentation fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation.

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.--

Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.Fair 3.5 (3.50%) - 3.5 (3.50%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.--

Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%)Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Fair 3.5 (3.50%) - 3.5 (3.50%)Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%)Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.