Question : 121) Ceteris paribus when graphing a relationship refers to A) letting : 1237972

Economics

121) Ceteris paribus when graphing a relationship refers to

A) letting all the variables change at once.

B) changing the origin of the graph.

C) holding constant all but two variables.

D) rescaling the coordinates.

E) swapping the axes so that the x-axis is the vertical axis and the y-axis is the horizontal axis.

122) When two variables in a graph are related to a third, changing the third causes

A) a movement along the curve.

B) a shift of the curve.

C) no change in the curve because the third variable isn’t on the axes.

D) either a shift or a movement in the curve but more information is needed to determine which occurs.

E) None of the above answers is correct.

123) On a graph showing the relationship between x and y, the ceteris paribus condition implies that

A) no other variables are related to x and y.

B) the value of x is held constant.

C) the value of y is held constant.

D) other variables not shown are held constant.

E) the value of x and the value of y are held constant.

124) Three variables are related and two of them are plotted in a figure. If the variable that is not measured on either the x-axis or the y-axis changes, then there is

A) a movement along the drawn curve.

B) a shift in the curve.

C) no impact on the curve because the variable is not measured on either of the axes.

D) either a shift in the curve or a movement along the curve, but more information is needed to determine which.

E) None of the above answers is correct.

125) The above figure shows how many pounds of peanuts farmers are willing to sell at different prices per pound of peanuts. If the price of a pound of peanuts is $1 and the price of a pound of pecans is $2, peanut farmers are willing to sell

A) no peanuts.

B) 1000 pounds of peanuts.

C) 2000 pounds of peanuts.

D) 4000 pounds of peanuts.

E) more than 4000 pounds of peanuts.

126) In the above figure, while drawing the line showing the relationship between the price of a pound of peanuts and the quantity sold, the

A) price of a pound of pecans does not change.

B) price of a pound of peanuts does not change.

C) the quantity of peanuts that farmers supply does not change.

D) Both answers A and B are correct.

E) Both answers B and C are correct.

127) In the figure above, suppose the price of a pound of pecans is negatively related to the quantity of peanuts that farmers are willing to supply. If the price of pecans increases,

A) the curve will shift rightward.

B) the curve will shift leftward.

C) there is a movement along the curve.

D) the curve will be unaffected.

E) None of the above answers is correct because the graph assumes that the price of pecans does not change.

128) To graph a relationship that involves more than two variables, we use

A) a positive relationship.

B) a direct relationship.

C) a negative relationship.

D) ceteris paribus.

E) movement up along one of the lines showing the relationship between x and y.

129) In the figure above, an increase in z leads to a

A) movement up along one of the lines showing the relationship between x and y.

B) movement down along one of the lines showing the relationship between x and y.

C) rightward shift of the line showing the relationship between x and y.

D) leftward shift of the line showing the relationship between x and y.

E) trend change in both x and y.

130) In the figure above, ceteris paribus, an increase in x is associated with

A) an increase in y.

B) a decrease in y.

C) an increase in z.

D) a random change in z.

E) no change in either y or z.

Continue to order Get a quote

July 1, 2023

Please use the following articles, professor feedback, rubric and attached PowerPoint

Assignment: Evidence-Based Capstone Project, Part 6: Disseminating Results

The dissemination of EBP results serves multiple important roles. Sharing results makes the case for your decisions. It also adds to the body of knowledge, which creates opportunities for future practitioners. By presenting results, you also become an advocate for EBP, creating a culture within your organization or beyond that informs, educates, and promotes the effective use of EBP.

To Prepare:

Review the final PowerPoint presentation you submitted in Module 5, and make any necessary changes based on the feedback you have received and on lessons you have learned throughout the course.
Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.

To Complete:

Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project.

Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.
Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.

Articles

Membrive-Jiménez, M. J., Pradas-Hernández, L., Suleiman-Martos, N., Vargas-Román, K., Cañadas-De la Fuente, G. A., Gomez-Urquiza, J. L., & De la Fuente-Solana, E. I. (2020). Burnout in Nursing Managers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Related Factors, Levels and Prevalence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11). https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.3390/ijerph17113983

Chiara Dall’Ora, Jane Ball, Maria Reinius, & Peter Griffiths. (2020). Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. Human Resources for Health, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9

Adams, A., Hollingsworth, A., & Osman, A. (2019). The Implementation of a Cultural Change Toolkit to Reduce Nursing Burnout and Mitigate Nurse Turnover in the Emergency Department. JEN: Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(4), 452.

Suleiman-Martos, N., Gomez-Urquiza, J. L., Aguayo-Estremera, R., Cañadas-De La Fuente, G. A., De La Fuente-Solana, E. I., & Albendín-García, L. (2020). The effect of mindfulness training on burnout syndrome in nursing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Of Advanced Nursing. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1111/jan.14318

Professor's Feedback

Nice title slide.

Slide 2: "They aspire..." "Their vision...." "Their mission...." WHO is "they/their"?

The current problem is not completely defined. There are no notes pages. Scope of the problem is not clearly defined. There are only two sources listed-what about the four studies that should be critiqued here?

For the tables, share results not process. What did you learn about your topic specifically from the tables? This is the evidence to support the change you want to make.

The elements required are incomplete. Be sure to review the rubric each week, and to fully describe and discuss as required. Thanks for your hard work this week. I appreciate your efforts. I look forward to more information next week.

RUBRIC

Part 6: Disseminating Results

Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project:

· Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.
· Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.--

Levels of Achievement:Excellent 81 (81.00%) - 90 (90.00%)The narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the evidence-based project.

The narrated presentation accurately and clearly explains in detail how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples.

The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides a justification that details the selection of this dissemination strategy that is fully supported by specific and relevant examples.

The narrated presentation provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation.Good 72 (72.00%) - 80 (80.00%)The narrated presentation adequately summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the evidence-based project.

The narrated presentation accurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; some specific examples may be provided.

The narrated presentation accurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by specific examples.

The narrated presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation.Fair 63 (63.00%) - 71 (71.00%)The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the evidence-based project.

The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; inaccurate or vague examples may be provided.

The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by inaccurate or vague examples.

The narrated presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 62 (62.00%)The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the evidence-based project or is missing. The narrated presentation is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the evidence-based project or is missing.

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, no examples are provided, or it is missing.

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy, no examples are provided, or it is missing.

The narrated presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained or is missing. The presentation fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation.

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.--

Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.Fair 3.5 (3.50%) - 3.5 (3.50%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.--

Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%)Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Fair 3.5 (3.50%) - 3.5 (3.50%)Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%)Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.