Grand canyon fin 450 assignment chapter 12 practice problems

Details:
Complete the following problems from chapter 12 in the textbook:

P12-3
P12-4
P12-8
P12-12
P12-14
P12-18
Follow these instructions for completing and submitting your assignment:

Do all work in Excel. Do not submit Word files or *.pdf files.
Submit a single spreadsheet file for this assignment. Do not submit multiple files.
Place each problem on a separate spreadsheet tab.
Label all inputs and outputs and highlight your final answer.
Follow the directions in “Guidelines for Developing Spreadsheets.”

P12–3 Breakeven cash inflows and risk Blair Gasses and Chemicals is a supplier of highly  
purified gases to semiconductor manufacturers. A large chip producer has asked Blair  
to build a new gas production facility close to an existing semiconductor plant. Once  
the new gas plant is in place, Blair will be the exclusive supplier for that semiconductor  
fabrication plant for the subsequent 5 years. Blair is considering one of two plant  
designs. The first is Blair’s “standard” plant, which will cost $30 million to build. The  
second is for a “custom” plant, which will cost $40 million to build. The custom plant  
will allow Blair to produce the highly specialized gases that are required for an emerging  
semiconductor manufacturing process. Blair estimates that its client will order  
$10 million of product per year if the traditional plant is constructed, but if the customized  
design is put in place, Blair expects to sell $15 million worth of product annually  
to its client. Blair has enough money to build either type of plant, and, in the absence  
of risk differences, accepts the project with the highest NPV. The cost of capital is 12%.  
  
a. Find the NPV for each project. Are the projects acceptable?  
b. Find the breakeven cash inflow for each project.
c. The firm has estimated the probabilities of achieving various ranges of cash inflows for the two projects as shown in the following table. What is the probability that each project will achieve at least the breakeven cash inflow found in part b?
d. Which project is more risky? Which project has the potentially higher NPV? Discuss the risk–return trade-offs of the two projects.
e. If the firm wished to minimize losses (that is, NPV < $0), which project would you recommend? Which would you recommend if the goal were to achieve a higher NPV?

P12–4 Basic scenario analysis Murdock Paints is in the process of evaluating two mutually
exclusive additions to its processing capacity. The firm’s financial analysts have developed
pessimistic, most likely, and optimistic estimates of the annual cash inflows
associated with each project. These estimates are shown in the following table.

a. Determine the range of annual cash inflows for each of the two projects.
b. Assume that the firm’s cost of capital is 10% and that both projects have 20-year lives. Construct a table similar to this one for the NPVs for each project. Include the range of NPVs for each project.
c. Do parts a and b provide consistent views of the two projects? Explain.
d. Which project do you recommend? Why?

P12–8 Risk-adjusted discount rates: Basic Country Wallpapers is considering investing in
one of three mutually exclusive projects, E, F, and G. The firm’s cost of capital, r, is
15%, and the risk-free rate, Rғ, is 10%. The firm has gathered the basic cash flow
and risk index data for each project as shown in the following table.
a. Find the net present value (NPV) of each project using the firm’s cost of capital.
Which project is preferred in this situation?
b. The firm uses the following equation to determine the risk-adjusted discount
rate, RADRj, for each project j:

RADRј= Rғ + [Riј X (r – Rғ)]
where
Rғ = risk = free rate of return
RIj = risk index for project j
r = cost of capital
Substitute each project’s risk index into this equation to determine its RADR.
c. Use the RADR for each project to determine its risk-adjusted NPV. Which project
is preferable in this situation?
d. Compare and discuss your findings in parts a and c. Which project do you recommend
that the firm accept?

P12–12 Risk classes and RADR Moses Manufacturing is attempting to select the best of
three mutually exclusive projects, X, Y, and Z. Although all the projects have 5-year
lives, they possess differing degrees of risk. Project X is in class V, the highest-risk
class; project Y is in class II, the below-average-risk class; and project Z is in class
III, the average-risk class. The basic cash flow data for each project and the risk
classes and risk-adjusted discount rates (RADRs) used by the firm are shown in the
following tables.

a. Find the risk-adjusted NPV for each project.
b. Which project, if any, would you recommend that the firm undertake?

P12–14 Unequal lives: ANPV approach Portland Products is considering the purchase of
one of three mutually exclusive projects for increasing production efficiency. The
firm plans to use a 14% cost of capital to evaluate these equal-risk projects. The initial
investment and annual cash inflows over the life of each project are shown in the
following table.

a. Calculate the NPV for each project over its life. Rank the projects in descending
order on the basis of NPV.
b. Use the annualized net present value (ANPV) approach to evaluate and rank the
projects in descending order on the basis of ANPV.
c. Compare and contrast your findings in parts a and b. Which project would you
recommend that the firm purchase? Why?

P12–18 Capital rationing: IRR and NPV approaches Valley Corporation is attempting to select
the best of a group of independent projects competing for the firm’s fixed capital
budget of $4.5 million. The firm recognizes that any unused portion of this budget
will earn less than its 15% cost of capital, thereby resulting in a present value of inflows
that is less than the initial investment. The firm has summarized, in the following
table, the key data to be used in selecting the best group of projects.

a. Use the internal rate of return (IRR) approach to select the best group of projects.
P12–18 Capital rationing: IRR and NPV approaches Valley Corporation is attempting to select
the best of a group of independent projects competing for the firm’s fixed capital
budget of $4.5 million. The firm recognizes that any unused portion of this budget
will earn less than its 15% cost of capital, thereby resulting in a present value of inflows
that is less than the initial investment. The firm has summarized, in the following
table, the key data to be used in selecting the best group of projects.

a. Use the internal rate of return (IRR) approach to select the best group of projects.
b. Use the net present value (NPV) approach to select the best group of projects.
c. Compare, contrast, and discuss your findings in parts a and b.
d. Which projects should the firm implement? Why?

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more