Assignment 2 – Recruitment Exercise
Maximum Points = 25
You work in HR for a medium-sized city of approximately 1 million people. Approximately 30% of the city’s residents are racial of ethnic minorities, with a significant proportion of African-American and Hispanic residents.
There has been a hiring freeze for several years. But now the city has some money to expand hiring. It is going to hire more fire fighters.
The city wants to recruit approximately 1,000 additional fire fighters. At the present time, the fire department is overwhelmingly white (and male). Many of the current fire fighters are the sons and nephews of former or current fire fighters. Many are of Irish or Italian descent; their relatives had taken jobs as fire fighters at a time when the working conditions were considered dangerous and unattractive. However, over the years, the fire fighters’ union had achieved more and more benefits and greater safety standards. The jobs are now considered quite attractive, well paid and flexible.
In the past, potential recruits to the first department learned of the civil service exams through word of mouth from relatives who worked for the fire department; some of them had access to a ‘bank’ of former exam questions that had been collected and stored at fire stations.
The entry exam for the fire department in the past consisted of a series of essay questions, posing hypothetical questions that a fire fighter might encounter in a fire. They were designed by officers of the fire department one afternoon when they got together and thought up essay questions to put on the exams. In the past, minorities (many of whom were educated in under-resourced schools in the economically-deprived neighborhoods in which minorities tended to be concentrated) did very poorly on these essay-based exams.
Generally speaking, while approximately 25% of white candidates scored well enough to be placed on a civil service list from which appointments would be made for several years, and had a good chance of being appointed, only approximately 10% of minority candidates scored well enough to ‘pass’ the exam, and were not placed on the hiring list.
The Fire Commission would like to increase minority representation in the ranks of the Fire Department, if possible. The Commission has asked the city HR department for which you work to design a recruitment campaign and suggest an entrance exam that might achieve its goals of increasing minority representation in the fire department.
Your assignment is to write a memorandum to the Fire Commission about recruitment practices of the Fire Department and to suggest ways that might achieve the Commission’s desired goals.
In your memorandum, you should cover the following points:
1. Critique the past recruitment practices of the Fire Department in light of what you know about the legal principles of discrimination, particularly the disparate impact theory of race discrimination. Would you recommend following the same recruitment practices of the past (e.g., word-of-mouth recruitment, essay-based exam questions)? Why or why not? If the same practices were followed and approximately the same outcomes achieved, could these outcomes be challenged under the disparate impact theory of racial discrimination? What would have to be shown to defend the outcome?
2. What changes, if any, would you suggest in the recruitment campaign you have been asked to help design? What specific recruitment techniques might increase the diversity of the pool of applicants? Are there any approaches to increasing the success rate for minority applicants that you would rule out from consideration? If so, why (relating your advice to your knowledge of disparate treatment law)?
3. Assuming that, despite your best efforts, the success rate for recruiting minority applicants is less than 80% of the success rate for non-minority applicants. What would your advice be to the Fire Commission when it had to determine whether to certify the results? What would be necessary to defend the adequacy of the recruitment/testing methods against a possible challenge? What steps could be taken to enhance the likelihood of a successful defense of the recruitment/testing methods in the unfortunate event that minority applicants did much worse than non-minority applicants on the test?
4. Finally, there are no women fire fighters employed by the city, although other, similarly-sized cities do have a significant number of women fire fighters. What general advice might you give as to approaching this issue, in hopes of ultimately increasing the number of women fire fighters?
You can use the above points to structure your memorandum, but be sure to consider and address the following issues, which are implicit in the exercise:
- What sort of recruitment campaign would you suggest to increase the number of minority applicants? Discuss advertising and other approaches to this topic.
- Discuss how you might try to achieve the Fire Commission’s desire to have a fire department that more accurately reflects the population it serves, with specific reference to the wish to have approximately 30% of the new hires to be from the minority communities.
- Discuss how you would approach the issue of designing an entrance exam to avoid a much lower pass rate for minority candidates than non-minority candidates.
- In the past, women have done better than any other group of candidates on the written exam, but have all failed the physical exam. There are no women fire fighters employed by the city, although other cities have them. How would you approach the issue of trying to recruit women and succeed in hiring women fire fighters?
You may wish to “read ahead” and consider the Supreme Court Ricci decision.
The format for this assignment should be a memorandum to the Fire Commission, using paragraphs and complete sentences. Your paper will be graded according to the following rubric.
Your assignment will be graded according to the following rubric:
|
RUBRIC CATEGORIES
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Fair
|
Poor
|
Points & Comments
|
|
ADDRESSES ALL ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS
(0-5 points)
|
Follows directions to the letter, and addresses all four parts.
|
Shows command of the facts and law, but does not follow directions.
|
Fails to address one or more of the required topics.
|
Ignores directions as to requested form.
|
|
|
SKILL IN WRITING AND ANALYSIS
Degree of sophistication or depth of thought
(0-15 points)
|
Carefully delineates and analyses all of the relevant law and facts.
|
Lists all the most relevant facts and law, but treats them in a cursory manner
|
Omits relevant facts/law or places emphasis on less relevant items.
|
Covers only a portion of the important laws and/or facts in reaching a conclusion.
|
|
|
MECHANICS AND GRAMMAR
Mechanics of memorandum
(0-5 points)
|
No errors of spelling or grammar; well-presented structure.
|
A few spelling or grammatical errors
|
Sloppy structure and/or spelling or grammar errors
|
Many spelling or grammar errors and poor structure.
|
