Entertainment Tour Management Case Study
A tour or music documentary can be a powerful way to engage audiences and highlight the behind-the-scenes aspects of an entertainment tour or music production. According to Buzz Feed’s Blake Harper (2021), “Music documentaries are one of the best sub-genres in the world of documentaries, functioning as windows into the inner lives of musicians as they are rising, falling, fighting, or simply playing some kick-ass tunes.”
To add to Harper’s sentiments, documentaries are great resources to help you understand the tour life through the lens of various perspectives especially scanning the environment. Within this written, Buzz Feed suggested 13 of the Best Music Documentaries to watch and to answer the questions in this case study you will need to choose one of the documentaries which will include some honorable mentions from my own list and Rolling Stones list. The goal is to pick a documentary that you are interested knowing more about
Remember to answer the questions and follow the rubric. Be sure to carefully review the rubric to receive maximum credit for your submission. Grammar and spelling will be checked. Times New Roman, 12-point or Arial 10-point font. Provides detailed responses to the guiding reflection questions.
You will answer and discuss the following case points:
1. If you had to explain the documentary you watched to a stakeholder, how would you describe the film?
2. What is the story-line of the documentary?
3. Based on the documentary of choice, how was the crew, performers, and logistics during production managed?
4. How do you measure the success of the documentary and its impact on the band’s brand and reputation?
5. What are at least 3 details you can identify or notice during the documentary story-line
“per-production, production, or post-production that you learned in the course?
6. On a scale of 1 -10, would you recommend this documentary to you classmates? Why or why not?
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You can make your documentary selections from the table below. Please click on the links for an exhaustive list.
Case Study Rubric Sample (2) (1)
|
Case Study Rubric Sample (2) (1)
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClear Explanation of Key Strategic Issues
• The problems, scope, and seriousness was clearly identified in the discussions.
• There was a well focused diagnosis of strategic issues and key problems that demonstrated a good grasp of the company’s present situation and strategic issues.
• Did not waste space summarizing information already found in the case.
|
|
30 to >21.0 pts
Exceeds Standard
Shows superior knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Effective Executive Summary.
|
21 to >13.5 pts
At Standard
Shows adequate knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Executive summary adequate.
|
13.5 to >7.5 pts
Approaching Standard
Shows some understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Executive summary inadequate.
|
7.5 to >0 pts
Below Standard
Shows little understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Executive summary missing or poorly constructed.
|
|
30 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValid Arguments; Relevant Supportive Detail
• Logically organized, key points, key arguments, and important criteria for evaluating business strategies were easily identified. • Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were identified and clearly analyzed and supported.
|
|
30 to >21.0 pts
Exceeds Standard
Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.
|
21 to >13.5 pts
At Standard
Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were partially identified, analyzed, and supported.
|
13.5 to >7.5 pts
Approaching Standard
Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were not clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.
|
7.5 to >0 pts
Below Standard
Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were poorly identified, analyzed, and supported.
|
|
30 pts
|
|
Appropriate Analysis, Evaluation, Synthesis for the Specific Industry Identified
• There was complete data on which to base a thorough analysis. • Key change drivers underlying the issues were identified. • Synthesis, analysis, and evaluations were clearly presented and supported in a literate and effective manner.
|
|
30 to >21.0 pts
Exceeds Standard
Analysis of key change drivers and the underlying the issues were clearly identified.
|
21 to >13.5 pts
At Standard
Analysis of key change drivers and the underlying the issues were partially identified.
|
13.5 to >7.5 pts
Approaching Standard
Analysis of key change drivers and the underlying the issues were not identified.
|
7.5 to >0 pts
Below Standard
Analysis of key change drivers and the underlying the issues inadequate.
|
|
30 pts
|
|
Conclusions and Recommendations are Congruent with Strategic Analysis
• Specific recommendations and/or plans of action provided. • Specific data or facts were referred to when necessary to support the analysis and conclusions. • Recommendations and conclusions were presented and supported in a literate and effective manner.
|
|
30 to >21.0 pts
Exceeds Standard
Effective recommendations, solutions, and/or plans of action were provided. Specific data or facts were referred when necessary to support the analysis and conclusions.
|
21 to >13.5 pts
At Standard
Effective recommendations and/or plans of action were partially provided. Specific data or facts were occasionally referred when necessary to support the analysis and conclusions.
|
13.5 to >7.5 pts
Approaching Standard
Effective recommendations and/or plans of action inadequate. Specific data or facts were not referred when necessary to support the analysis and conclusions.
|
7.5 to >0 pts
Below Standard
Effective recommendations and/or plans of action not provided. Specific data or facts necessary to support the analysis and conclusions was not provided.
|
|
30 pts
|
Proper organization, professional writing, and logical flow of analysis. APA formatting
• Logically organized, key points, key arguments, and important criteria for evaluating the business logic easily identified. • Key points were supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. • Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, 3rd person objective view, professional writing, and syntax.
|
30 to >21.0 pts
Exceeds Standard
Key points were clearly identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. Excellent grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax.
|
21 to >13.5 pts
At Standard
Key points were partially identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. Adequate grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax.
|
13.5 to >7.5 pts
Approaching Standard
Key points were not identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax needs improvement.
|
7.5 to >0 pts
Below Standard
Key points were poorly identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax needs significant improvement.
|
30 pts
Total Points: 150
