One of the primary values associated with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) is college readiness. Develop a PowerPoint presentation that argues for or against college readiness driving school curriculum. This argument should follow the Toulmin Model for Argumentation (Wheeler, n.d.) explained below:
Slide 1: Title page
Slide 2: Introduction of the problem or topic
Material to get the reader’s attention (a “hook”)
Introduce problem or topic
Introduce your claim or thesis, perhaps with accompanying qualifiers that limit the scope of the argument. (This will help you cut down the topic to a manageable length.)
Slide 3: Offer data (reasons or evidence) to support the argument
Datum #1
Datum #2
(and so on)
Slide 4: Explore warrants that show how the data is connected logically with other data
Warrant #1
Warrant #2
(and so on)
Slide 5: Offer factual backing to show the logic used in the warrants is good in terms of realism and theory
Backing for warrant #1
Backing for warrant #2
(and so on)
Slide 6: Discuss counter-arguments and provide rebuttal
Counter-argument #1
Rebuttal to counter-argument #1
Counter-argument #2
Rebuttal to counter-argument #2
(and so on)
Slide 7: Conclusion
Implications of the argument, summation of points, or final evocative thought to ensure the reader remembers the argument
Slide 8: Reference page with APA-style references
These additional References on College Readiness may be helpful in preparing your presentation.
Support your statements with evidence from the Required Studies and your research. Cite and reference your sources in APA style.
Read
Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Educational Issues (Koonce, 2015)
Unit 1 – 1.2: Should the Curriculum Be Standardized for All?
YES: The Paideia Proposal: Rediscovering the Essence of Education (Adler, 1982/2015)
NO: Escape from Childhood (Holt, 1974/2015)
Unit 2 – 2.3: Do American Schools Need a Common Curriculum?
YES: A Call for Common Content (Albert Shanker Institute, 2011/2015)
NO: Closing the Door on Innovation (Greene, Stoksky, Evers, Forster, & Wurman, 2011/2015)
Unit 1 – 1.5: Should “Public Schooling” Be Redefined?
YES: What Is a ‘Public School’? Principles for a New Century (Hess, 2004/2015)
NO: A Response to Frederick Hess (Nathan, Nathan, Bacchetti, & Clinchy, 2004/2015)
Read
Rethinking College Readiness (Conley, 2008) [PDF]
Common Core State Standards (June 2010) [PPT]
Myths v. Facts About Common Core State Standards (Common Core State Standards, n.d.) [PDF]
Toulmin Model for Argumentation (Wheeler, n.d.) [PDF]
Next Generation Science Standards (Achieve, 2013) [PDF]
Read the Standards (Common Core State Standards Initiative, n.d.) [Web page]
References on College Readiness [PDF]
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more