simulation training in education | Applied Sciences homework help

 

Technology Presentation

Submit Assignment

  • Due Apr 12 by 11:59pm
  • Points 240
  • Submitting a file upload

The purpose of this Course Project is to provide students the opportunity to explore a technology used in the healthcare system. The project requires students to work in a small team together in order to describe how this technology supports the patient care experience through the use of information technology and information structures. Teams and topics will be assigned and are nonnegotiable. The final product of this project is a presentation to be shared with the class in Unit 8.

Download the Technology Presentation guidelines (Links to an external site.).

Submit the assignment by the due date, as instructed by your faculty member.

Rubric

RUA Technology Presentation (NR360)RUA Technology Presentation (NR360)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduce Technology & Team*Title slide identifies the assigned technology and introduces team members *Provides an introduction *Describes the technology *States purpose(s) for the technology in healthcare. *Establishes the professional tone for the presentation.20.0 to >18.0 ptsOutstandingAll criteria met and thoroughly explicated.18.0 to >16.0 ptsVery GoodOne (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.16.0 to >15.0 ptsSatisfactoryOne (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.15.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThree (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory and Current Use*Describes significant findings that prompted the development of the technology *Discusses the history and current use of the technology in healthcare *Describes three goals of this technology’s implementation.30.0 to >27.0 ptsOutstandingAll criteria met and thoroughly explicated.27.0 to >25.0 ptsVery GoodOne (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.25.0 to >22.0 ptsSatisfactoryOne (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.22.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThree (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImpact on Healthcare and Nursing*Impact on professional nursing practice. *Patient safety impact (including statistical justification) *Impact on patient care delivery, quality care measures/monitoring, and risk management (privacy, confidentiality, and security) as applicable. *Ethical & legal considerations. *Infrastructure/ operational consequences (e.g., budget, costs, etc.) *Impact on a population and/or geographic region *Provide examples & statically significant data to support examples.40.0 to >36.0 ptsOutstandingThoroughly describes and accomplishes each criteria.36.0 to >33.0 ptsVery GoodDescribes/accomplishes each criteria.33.0 to >30.0 ptsSatisfactoryDescribes/accomplishes each of the criteria except for one (or more) component.30.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDescribes/accomplishes each of the criteria except for two (or more) component.40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThree Advantages and Disadvantages*Patient’s vantage point or perspective (e.g., patient outcomes, safety, patient/family satisfaction). *Nurse’s vantage point (improves/hinders job efficiency/safety) *Healthcare organization’s vantage point (regulatory compliance, financial, etc.).40.0 to >36.0 ptsOutstandingDescribes all criteria thoroughly.36.0 to >33.0 ptsVery GoodDoes not adequately describe one of the criteria thoroughly.33.0 to >30.0 ptsSatisfactoryDoes not adequately describe two of the criteria thoroughly.30.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDoes not adequately describe any of the criteria thoroughly.40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeControversy/ Issues/ Challenges/ Regulatory ImplicationsHow might issues surrounding the chosen technology be addressed/solved? *Provide statically significant data or evidence to support your findings.30.0 to >27.0 ptsOutstandingThoroughly describes each element.27.0 to >25.0 ptsVery GoodAdequately describes each element.25.0 to >22.0 ptsSatisfactoryDoes not adequately describe at least one element.22.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDoes not adequately describe at least two elements.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary*Key points *Discoveries/surprises *Lessons learned by the team20.0 to >18.0 ptsOutstandingThoroughly summarizes all elements.18.0 to >16.0 ptsVery GoodOne (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.16.0 to >15.0 ptsSatisfactoryOne (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.15.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThree (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeam Project Evaluation*Place & discuss the following questions and responses in the slides(s) following the summary slide and prior to the reference slide(s). *How did the team function well? (e.g., team strengths, team balance, etc.) *What problems did you have interacting as a team? (e.g., team weaknesses, outside challenges, technology, etc.) *What specific actions would you recommend to future teams to help them interact, function, and collaborate successfully?40.0 to >36.0 ptsOutstandingThoroughly meets all criteria.36.0 to >33.0 ptsVery GoodAdequately summarizes all elements.33.0 to >30.0 ptsSatisfactoryDoes not adequately summarizes one element.30.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDoes not adequately summarizes two or more elements.40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation, Scholarly Writing, & APA Format*25‐30 PowerPoint slides *Submitted to Dropbox/ Turnitin by Team leader only *Speaker Notes *Scholarly writing and APA guidelines *Citations & references *Spelling, grammar, and punctuation *Copyright and plagiarism rules.20.0 to >18.0 ptsOutstandingThoroughly accomplishes all guidelines.18.0 to >16.0 ptsVery GoodAdequately accomplishes all guidelines.16.0 to >15.0 ptsSatisfactoryDoes not adequately accomplish one or more of the guidelines.15.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDoes not adequately accomplish two or more of the guidelines.20.0 pts
Total Points: 240.0PreviousNextTop 

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more