Discussion week # 10 follow 1

Reply if you agree or disagree with the following post. 200 words.

—————————————————————————————

Relevance of the Surrogate Role in Contemporary Nursing Practice

The surrogate role by Peplau, underscores the importance of nurses providing support and advocacy for patients in the absence of family or significant others. Despite evolving healthcare dynamics, this role remains pertinent in addressing the complex needs of patients, particularly in scenarios where familial support is lacking. This discussion explores the continued relevance of the surrogate role in contemporary nursing practice, with a focus on its significance in psychiatric-mental health nursing.

In today’s healthcare landscape, patient care has become increasingly multifaceted, with individuals often presenting complex medical and psychosocial needs. A significant proportion of patients may lack familial support systems, either due to geographical distance, estranged relationships, or social circumstances. In such instances, the surrogate role takes on heightened importance as nurses’ step in to fulfill the emotional and supportive needs of these patients.

Nowhere is the relevance of the surrogate role more pronounced than in psychiatric-mental health nursing. Patients grappling with mental health conditions such as dysmorphia and anxiety often experience strained relationships with their families, leading to feelings of isolation and a dearth of emotional support. In these situations, nurses serve as crucial allies, offering empathy, understanding, and advocacy to facilitate the healing process.

Patients with mental health challenges frequently encounter barriers to familial support, exacerbating feelings of loneliness and alienation. Nurses trained in the surrogate role possess the skills to navigate these complexities sensitively. By establishing therapeutic alliances, conducting comprehensive assessments, and implementing tailored interventions, nurses can mitigate the adverse effects of isolation and support deficits on patients’ well-being.

Central to the surrogate role is the concept of advocacy, wherein nurses champion the rights and interests of their patients. In psychiatric-mental health settings, this advocacy extends beyond medical interventions to encompass social support, access to resources, and destigmatization efforts. By empowering patients to voice their needs and preferences, nurses foster a sense of agency and self-determination, essential components of recovery and resilience.

At the heart of the surrogate function lies the notion of advocacy, where nurses actively support and defend the rights and welfare of their patients. In psychiatric-mental health contexts, this advocacy transcends mere medical treatments to encompass provisions for social assistance, facilitating access to resources, and initiatives aimed at reducing stigma. By enabling patients to articulate their desires and choices, nurses cultivate feelings of empowerment and self-reliance, critical elements in the processes of recuperation and fortitude.

In conclusion, the surrogate role remains indispensable in contemporary nursing practice, particularly in addressing the intricate needs of patients who lack familial support. Nowhere is this role more evident than in psychiatric-mental health nursing, where nurses serve as stalwart advocates and allies for individuals navigating complex emotional landscapes. By upholding the principles of empathy, advocacy, and empowerment, nurses fulfill Peplau’s vision of the surrogate role as a cornerstone of compassionate and holistic patient care.

Continue to order Get a quote

July 1, 2023

Please use the following articles, professor feedback, rubric and attached PowerPoint

Assignment: Evidence-Based Capstone Project, Part 6: Disseminating Results

The dissemination of EBP results serves multiple important roles. Sharing results makes the case for your decisions. It also adds to the body of knowledge, which creates opportunities for future practitioners. By presenting results, you also become an advocate for EBP, creating a culture within your organization or beyond that informs, educates, and promotes the effective use of EBP.

To Prepare:

Review the final PowerPoint presentation you submitted in Module 5, and make any necessary changes based on the feedback you have received and on lessons you have learned throughout the course.
Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.

To Complete:

Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project.

Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.
Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.

Articles

Membrive-Jiménez, M. J., Pradas-Hernández, L., Suleiman-Martos, N., Vargas-Román, K., Cañadas-De la Fuente, G. A., Gomez-Urquiza, J. L., & De la Fuente-Solana, E. I. (2020). Burnout in Nursing Managers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Related Factors, Levels and Prevalence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11). https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.3390/ijerph17113983

Chiara Dall’Ora, Jane Ball, Maria Reinius, & Peter Griffiths. (2020). Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. Human Resources for Health, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9

Adams, A., Hollingsworth, A., & Osman, A. (2019). The Implementation of a Cultural Change Toolkit to Reduce Nursing Burnout and Mitigate Nurse Turnover in the Emergency Department. JEN: Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(4), 452.

Suleiman-Martos, N., Gomez-Urquiza, J. L., Aguayo-Estremera, R., Cañadas-De La Fuente, G. A., De La Fuente-Solana, E. I., & Albendín-García, L. (2020). The effect of mindfulness training on burnout syndrome in nursing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Of Advanced Nursing. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1111/jan.14318

Professor's Feedback

Nice title slide.

Slide 2: "They aspire..." "Their vision...." "Their mission...." WHO is "they/their"?

The current problem is not completely defined. There are no notes pages. Scope of the problem is not clearly defined. There are only two sources listed-what about the four studies that should be critiqued here?

For the tables, share results not process. What did you learn about your topic specifically from the tables? This is the evidence to support the change you want to make.

The elements required are incomplete. Be sure to review the rubric each week, and to fully describe and discuss as required. Thanks for your hard work this week. I appreciate your efforts. I look forward to more information next week.

RUBRIC

Part 6: Disseminating Results

Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project:

· Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.
· Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.--

Levels of Achievement:Excellent 81 (81.00%) - 90 (90.00%)The narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the evidence-based project.

The narrated presentation accurately and clearly explains in detail how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples.

The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides a justification that details the selection of this dissemination strategy that is fully supported by specific and relevant examples.

The narrated presentation provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation.Good 72 (72.00%) - 80 (80.00%)The narrated presentation adequately summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the evidence-based project.

The narrated presentation accurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; some specific examples may be provided.

The narrated presentation accurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by specific examples.

The narrated presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation.Fair 63 (63.00%) - 71 (71.00%)The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the evidence-based project.

The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; inaccurate or vague examples may be provided.

The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by inaccurate or vague examples.

The narrated presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 62 (62.00%)The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the evidence-based project or is missing. The narrated presentation is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the evidence-based project or is missing.

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, no examples are provided, or it is missing.

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy, no examples are provided, or it is missing.

The narrated presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained or is missing. The presentation fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation.

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.--

Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.Fair 3.5 (3.50%) - 3.5 (3.50%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.--

Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%)Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Fair 3.5 (3.50%) - 3.5 (3.50%)Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%)Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.