Unit 4 case study scenario | observation,assessent, & indiviualization

© 2023 Post University, Waterbury, CT
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CHS450 – Observation,
Assessment & Individualization

Unit 4 Assignment: Observing and Planning for Social Development

Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 4
Points: 100

Overview:

For this child observation assignment, you will write a two-page paper describing and
evaluating a plan for recording a child’s social development. You will base the paper on
the scenario below, focusing on the child’s behavior.

Instructions:

Begin by reading this scenario:

Scenario: You are a teacher in a class of three-year-olds. You have a new student in
your class named Chelsea. Before Chelsea’s first day, her mother told you that Chelsea
had had difficulties at previous centers. At the end of the first day, you can understand
why she’s had some challenges. Chelsea knocked all the books off the shelves during
playtime and toppled over another child’s block structure. You are determined to
understand more about Chelsea’s behavior, so you think about how you will gather data
on her behavior. (2022 Cengage Learning)

In writing your paper, include complete responses to the following eight prompts:

1. After reading the scenario, describe the assessment tool you would use to focus

on recording the child’s destruction of items around the room and explain why it
would be an appropriate way to document progress and promote a positive
outcome for the child. (NAEYC Standard 3c)

2. Create a plan for using the data you collected to determine a method to support
the child’s social development. Explain how this method addresses the issues in
the scenario. Give evidence from the chapter supporting this method (with
citations). (NAEYC Standard 3a)

3. Describe how you will create and share a preliminary action plan with the
student’s family. Please explain how you will encourage the child’s family to
share their thoughts on your analysis and their observations of their child in their
own environment. (NAEYC Standard 2b)

© 2023 Post University, Waterbury, CT
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

4. Describe a follow-up plan that would include how you would use the information
you learned from the family to collaborate with them and share and discuss the
progress with the family on modifying the concerning behavior. (NAEYC
Standard 1c)

5. Provide an example of how you would build assessment partnerships with
professional colleagues and the child’s family to help achieve a positive outcome
regarding the child’s social development. (NAEYC Standard 3d)

6. Research community resources in your area that you could suggest to the family
to support them and their child concerning the behavior. Describe the resource
and how it could be of benefit. (NAEYC Standard 2c)

7. Describe one way that you would address the situation regarding the child’s
concerning behavior by applying, expanding, integrating, or updating your
content knowledge of one of the following pedagogical “peh-duh-gow-jee-cal”
components: knowledge of classroom management and discipline; knowledge of
teaching methods or instructional strategies; knowledge of learning
environments; knowledge of classroom assessment. (NAEYC 5c)

8. Write a reflection on how the process of applying, analyzing, evaluating, and
creating a plan to address the concerning behavior of the child made you feel
about your role on you as a professional. Describe how and why you would use
these skills to advocate for children, families, and the profession. (NAEYC 6a)

Requirements:

• Address all aspects of the eight items above.
• Write two pages double-spaced with 1-inch margins (about 500 words).
• Include a cover and reference pages.
• Use 12 pt: Times New Roman or similar font.
• Use APA formatting.
• Submit the paper as an MS Word document using the assignment link in Unit 4.

Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
you write and again after you write.

© 2023 Post University, Waterbury, CT
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Evaluation Rubric for Unit 4 Assignment

CRITERIA

Excellent Good Fair Needs Improvement

10 points 8 – 9 points 5 – 7 points 0 – 4 points
Prompt 1
Standard 1c:
Understand how
child
development
and the learning
process occur in
multiple
contexts,
including family,
culture,
language,
community, and
early learning
settings, as well
as in a larger
societal context
that includes
structural
inequities.

Insightful
development and
mature style describe
the assessment tool
for recording the
child’s destruction of
items around the
room and explain
why it would be an
appropriate way to
document progress
and promote a
positive outcome for
the child.

Competent response
and thoughtful
analysis describe the
assessment tool and
explain why it would
be an appropriate
way to document
progress and
promote a positive
outcome for the
child.

Marginally
satisfactory in one or
more of the following
ways. It may respond
to the item illogically,
need more coherent
structure or
elaboration, or reflect
an incomplete
understanding.

The response shows
serious weaknesses,
ordinarily of several
kinds. It may present a
simplistic,
inappropriate, or
incoherent analysis of
or response to the
prompt, suggesting
some significant
misunderstanding of
the topic.

Prompt 2
Standard 3a:
Understand that
assessments
(formal and
informal,
formative, and
summative) are
conducted to
make informed
choices about
instruction and

Insightful
development and
mature style describe
the preliminary action
plan and how to
share it with the
student’s family to
encourage
collaboration and
obtain information
about the child’s
behavior at home.

Competent response
and thoughtful
analysis
describe the
preliminary action
plan and how to
share it with the
student’s family to
encourage
collaboration and
obtain information
about the child at
home.

Marginally
satisfactory in one or
more of the following
ways. It may respond
to the item illogically,
need more coherent
structure or
elaboration, or reflect
an incomplete
understanding.

The response shows
serious weaknesses,
ordinarily of several
kinds. It may present a
simplistic,
inappropriate, or
incoherent analysis of
or response to the
prompt, suggesting
some significant
misunderstanding of
the topic.

Prompt 3
Standard 5c:
Using own
knowledge,
appropriate
early learning
standards,
and other resources
to design, implement,
and evaluate
developmentally
meaningful and
challenging
curriculum for each
child

Insightful
development and
mature style that
identifies
appropriate next
steps for learning
based upon
observation data,
own knowledge,
and early learning
standards, plans
developmentally
appropriate ways to
support learning,
and reflects upon
current strategies in
place as
appropriate.

Competent response
and thoughtful
analysis identify
appropriate next
steps for learning
based upon
observation data and
own knowledge, plan
strategies to support
learning and reflect
upon current
strategies.

Marginally
satisfactory in one or
more of the following
ways. It may respond
to the item illogically,
need more coherent
structure or
elaboration, or reflect
an incomplete
understanding.

The response shows
serious weaknesses,
ordinarily of several
kinds. It may present a
simplistic,
inappropriate, or
incoherent analysis of
or response to the
prompt, suggesting
some significant
misunderstanding of
the topic.

© 2023 Post University, Waterbury, CT
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CRITERIA

Excellent Good Fair Needs Improvement

Prompt 4
Standard 2b:
Collaborate as
partners with
families in
young children’s
development
and learning
through
respectful,
reciprocal
relationships
and
engagement.

Insightful
development and
mature style used to
describe how to
share a preliminary
action plan with the
student’s family and
encourage the family
to share their
thoughts on your
analysis and their
observations of their
child in their
environment.

Competent response
and thoughtful
analysis describe
how to share a
preliminary action
plan with the
student’s family and
encourage the family
to share their
thoughts on your
analysis and their
observations of their
child in their
environment.

Marginally
satisfactory in one or
more of the following
ways. It may respond
to the item illogically,
need more coherent
structure or
elaboration, or reflect
an incomplete
understanding.

The response shows
serious weaknesses,
ordinarily of several
kinds. It may present a
simplistic,
inappropriate, or
incoherent analysis of
or response to the
prompt, suggesting
some significant
misunderstanding of
the topic.

Prompt 5
Standard 2c:
Use community
resources to support
young children’s
learning and
development and
support families, and
build partnerships
between early
learning settings,
schools, and
community
organizations and
agencies.

Insightful
development and
mature style
describe a
community
resource and how it
could benefit the
child regarding the
concerning
behavior.

Competent response
and thoughtful
analysis describe a
community resource
and how it could
benefit the child
regarding the
concerning behavior.

Marginally
satisfactory in one or
more of the following
ways. It may respond
to the item illogically,
need more coherent
structure or
elaboration, or reflect
an incomplete
understanding.

The response shows
serious weaknesses,
ordinarily of several
kinds. It may present a
simplistic,
inappropriate, or
incoherent analysis of
or response to the
prompt, suggesting
some significant
misunderstanding of
the topic.

Prompt 6
Standard 3c:
Use screening
and assessment
tools in ways
that are ethically
grounded and
developmentally
, ability,
culturally, and
linguistically
appropriate to
document
developmental
progress and
promote positive
outcomes for
each child.

Insightful
development and
mature style are used
to provide an
accurate description
of an appropriate
tool(s) to record the
child’s destruction of
items around the
room and an
informed explanation
of why it would be an
appropriate way to
document progress
and promote a
positive outcome for
the child.

Competent response
and thoughtful
analysis are used to
accurately describe
an appropriate
tool(s) to record the
child’s destruction of
items around the
room and sensible
reasoning of why it
would be an
appropriate way to
document progress
and promote a
positive outcome for
the child.

Marginally
satisfactory in one or
more of the following
ways. It may respond
to the item illogically,
need more coherent
structure or
elaboration, or reflect
an incomplete
understanding.

The response shows
serious weaknesses,
ordinarily of several
kinds. It may present a
simplistic,
inappropriate, or
incoherent analysis of
or response to the
prompt, suggesting
some significant
misunderstanding of
the topic.

Prompt 7
Standard 3d:
Build assessment
partnerships with
families and
professional
colleagues.

Insightful
development and a
mature style are used
to describe examples
of how to build
assessments.

Competent and
thoughtful
analysis
are used to describe
examples of how to
build assessments.

Marginally
satisfactory in one or
more of the following
ways. It may respond
to the item illogically,
need more coherent

The response shows
serious weaknesses,
ordinarily of several
kinds. It may present a
simplistic,
inappropriate, or

© 2023 Post University, Waterbury, CT
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CRITERIA

Excellent Good Fair Needs Improvement

partnerships with
professional
colleagues and the
child’s family to help
achieve a positive
outcome regarding
the child’s social
development.

partnerships with
professional
colleagues and the
child’s family to help
achieve a positive
outcome regarding
the child’s social
development.

structure or
elaboration, or reflect
an incomplete
understanding.

incoherent analysis of
or response to the
prompt, suggesting
some significant
misunderstanding of
the topic.

20 points 16 – 19 points 10 – 15 points 0 – 9 points
Prompt 8
Standard 6a:
Standard 6a Identify
and involve
themselves with the
early childhood field
and serve as
informed advocates
for young children,
families, and the
profession.

Insightful
development and
mature style
demonstrate
professionalism by
reflecting upon the
how the behavior and
attitude they
described of
themselves as the
teacher in the
scenario make them
feel regarding the
importance of being
an informed advocate
for children, families,
and the profession.

Competent
response and
thoughtful analysis
demonstrate
professionalism by
reflecting upon the
how the behavior
and attitude they
described of
themselves as the
teacher in the
scenario make them
feel regarding the
importance of being
an informed
advocate for
children, families,
and the profession.

Competent
response and
thoughtful analysis
demonstrate
professionalism by
reflecting upon the
how the behavior and
attitude they
described of
themselves as the
teacher in the
scenario make them
feel regarding the
importance of being
an informed
advocate for children,
families, and the
profession.

The response shows
serious weaknesses,
ordinarily of several
kinds. It may present a
simplistic,
inappropriate, or
incoherent analysis of
or response to the
prompt, suggesting
some significant
misunderstanding of
the meaning of
professionalism in the
context of an early
childhood educator.

10 points 8 – 9 points 6 – 7 points 0 – 5 points
SS3. Candidates
have effective skills
in written and verbal
communication.
and are
technologically
literate.

Errors impede
professional
presentation;
guidelines are not
followed.

Significant
errors that do not
impede professional
presentation.

Few errors that do
not impede
professional
presentation.

The writing and format
are clear, professional,
APA-compliant, and
error free.

  • Overview:
  • Instructions:
  • Requirements:
  • Evaluation Rubric for Unit 4 Assignment
Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more