Global awareness | American history homework help

Global Awareness Assignment

Purpose

This assignment asks you to demonstrate the course competency of 
Global Awareness by explaining how local, regional, national, and global events influenced the interactions between different groups of people in American history. The practice of contextualization is not only a critical skill that professional historians use every day, it is a skill that is essential to functioning as a well-informed citizen in society today. In this assignment, you will choose two demographic groups and explain how national or global events impacted the relationship between the two groups. 

Learning Outcomes

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate your knowledge of the interrelatedness of local, global, international, and intercultural issues, trends, and systems. You are required to analyze the debates over the admission of African Americans into the Army Air Corps during World War II.  You must consider the opposition of the U.S. Army and former Secretary of the Army, Kenneth C. Royall, to Executive Order 9981 which desegregated the armed forces.   Kenneth Royall went so far to say in 1949 that the army “was not an instrument for social evolution.”  Additionally, evaluate how international and/or domestic events shaped the debate over desegregation of the military in the United States. 

Evaluation Process:

· Describe how historical context shapes group interactions.  For example, how does your thesis address the views of both supporters and opponents of Executive Order 9981.

· Explain the interrelationship of events on the local, regional, national, and/or global levels.  For example, the belief that “African Americans fought for freedom at home and abroad during World War II.”

· Use primary sources together with prior knowledge to engage in critical thinking about a topic within the historical context.

Assignment Tasks

In between 1,200 to 1,500 words, use and analyze the article written by Gropman, A. L. on “Tuskegee Airmen”, Kenneth C. Royall’s quote, “the army was not an instrument for social evolution”, course notes, and information from chapter 24 to answer the following prompt:

What does the article reveal about the treatment of African Americans during World War II?  What could the United States government could have done different to prevent anomalies committed against African Americans in the armed forces? And, do you think that African Americans were fighting for freedom not only abroad but at home? If so, explain.

 

Please click on the link below to access article:

Gropman, A. L. (1996). Tuskegee Airmen. 
Air Force Magazine (March 1996), 52-56.


Tuskegee AirmenLinks to an external site.

Optional Additional Resources:  


African Americans Online ArticleLinks to an external site.

Criteria

·
Argument: Does your paper have a clear, singular, specific argument that answers the question?

·
Evidence: Do you use all of the relevant evidence to defend your argument?

·
Organization: Does your paper have a logical structure and use clear topic sentences and transitions?

·
Clarity: Is your prose efficient, crisp and polished, free of excessive passive voice or distracting spelling or grammatical errors?

Formatting:

· 12-pt., Times New Roman font, double-spaced

· 1” margins

· 1200-1500 words (4-5 full, double-spaced pages)

·
Make sure you stay below 15% plagiarism

APA Style

You must provide 4-5 references.  One must be from your textbook and one from the article provided.

 

Submit your completed assignment in Canvas.  No essays will be accepted through FIU email.  Essay will be reviewed for plagiarism in ”
Turn-it-in“.  

 

Rubric

Global Awareness Rubric 1

Global Awareness Rubric 1

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus

Does the submission follow instructions?

30 to >27.0 pts

Full Marks

The paper completely addresses the prompt. It has a singular, clear, and concise argument that answers the question.

27 to >24.0 pts

Acceptable

The paper generally addresses the prompt. It provides an argument that answers the question.

24 to >21.0 pts

Developing

Attempts to address the prompt, but ideas are unclear. Argument is limited.

21 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Does not attempt to address the prompt or ideas are unoriginal. Argument provided is weak and unclear.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence

Does the paper contain sufficient examples to support thesis?

35 to >32.0 pts

Full Marks

The paper contains 3 or more clear examples that offer compelling support for the thesis. Paper provides 4 to 5 reliable references.

32 to >28.0 pts

Acceptable

The paper contains 3 or more clear examples that offer moderate support for the thesis. Paper provides 3 reliable references.

28 to >24.0 pts

Developing

The paper contains 2 or more clear examples that offer some support for the thesis. Paper provides 2 reliable references.

24 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

The paper contains one example or less. Paper does not provide any references.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation

Does the paper provide sufficient explanation for why the examples support the thesis?

35 to >32.0 pts

Full Marks

The paper’s explanations are consistently convincing. Paper contains a logical structure and polished topic sentences.

32 to >28.0 pts

Acceptable

The paper’s explanations are mostly convincing. Paper contains a concise structure and clear topic sentences.

28 to >24.0 pts

Developing

The paper’s explanations are sometimes convincing. Paper contains a limited structure and topic sentences.

24 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No attempt is made to explain how evidence supports the thesis. Paper does not contain a clear structure and very limited use of topic sentences.

35 pts

Total Points: 100



PREVIOUS

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more