NUR4153CBE Section 01CBE Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment (11 Weeks) – CBE Online Course – 2024 Summer Quarter

Deliverable 5 – Outcomes-based Cycle of Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Assignment Content

1.

Top of Form

Competency

Modify clinical judgment within an iterative, outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning and client needs.

Student Success Criteria

View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.

Scenario

You were recently invited to your alma mater to participate in a clinical judgment roundtable with alums. The audience includes nursing students enrolled in their last term before graduation. You were asked to prepare a one-to-two-page handout for the round table discussion to facilitate a conversation about the outcomes-based dynamic cycle of clinical reasoning and clinical judgment.

Instructions

Create a one-to-two-page handout that includes the following information:

· Summarize a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including examples and rationales.

· Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

· Choose the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

Resources

·

APA 7th Edition Guide

·

Writing Guide

Submit a Word document with your handout.

Bottom of Form

·
A – 4 – Mastery

Comprehensive summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including superior examples and rationales.

0

B – 3 – Proficiency

Satisfactory summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including sufficient examples and rationales.

0

C – 2 – Competence

Somewhat reasonable summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including some examples and rationales.

0

F – 1 – No Pass

Partial summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including minimal examples and rationales.

0

I – 0 – Not Submitted

Not Submitted

0

·
Criterion 2

0% of total grade

A – 4 – Mastery

Detailed description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior rationales and evidence from credible sources.

0

B – 3 – Proficiency

Satisfactory description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient rationales and evidence from credible sources.

0

C – 2 – Competence

Somewhat reasonable description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some rationales and evidence from credible sources.

0

F – 1 – No Pass

Partial description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal rationales and evidence from credible sources.

0

I – 0 – Not Submitted

Not Submitted

0

·
Criterion 3

0% of total grade

A – 4 – Mastery

Skillful selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

0

B – 3 – Proficiency

Satisfactory selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

0

C – 2 – Competence

Somewhat reasonable selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

0

F – 1 – No Pass

Vague of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.

0

I – 0 – Not Submitted

Not Submitted

0

·
Criterion 4