12/22/23, 4:10 PMAssessing the Problem: Technology, Care Coordination, and Community Resources Considerations Scoring Guide
Page 1 of 2https://a21371-1390071.cluster223.canvas-user-content.com/courses…57&context_type=Course&download=1&id=213710000001390071&inline=1
Assessing the Problem: Technology, Care Coordination, and Community
Resources Considerations Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-
PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Analyze the impact
of health care
technology on a
patient, family, or
population problem.
Does not describe
the impact of
health care
technology on a
patient, family, or
population
problem.
Describes the
impact of health
care technology on
a patient, family, or
population
problem.
Analyzes the impact
of health care
technology on a
patient, family, or
population problem.
Conducts an astute analysis of
the impact of health care
technology on a patient, family,
or population problem. Cites
credible and balanced evidence
of the advantages and
disadvantages of specific
technologies. Provides clear
insight into current technology
use in professional practice, as
well as potential barriers and
costs.
Explain how care
coordination and the
utilization of
community
resources can be
used to address a
patient, family, or
population problem.
Does not describe
the value of care
coordination and
the utilization of
community
resources in
addressing health
care challenges.
Attempts to
describe the value
of care
coordination and
the utilization of
community
resources in
addressing health
care challenges.
Explains how care
coordination and the
utilization of
community
resources can be
used to address a
patient, family, or
population problem.
Provides a convincing
explanation of how care
coordination and the utilization of
community resources can be
used to address a patient, family,
or population problem. Cites
credible and balanced evidence
of the benefits of care
coordination and the use of
community resources. Provides
clear insight into current use in
professional practice, as well as
potential barriers.
Analyze state board
nursing practice
standards and/or
organizational or
governmental
policies associated
with health
technology, care
coordination, and
community
resources
and document the
practicum hours
spent with these
individuals or group
in the Capella
Academic Portal
Volunteer Experience
Form.
Does not describe
state board
nursing practice
standards and/or
organizational or
governmental
policies
associated with
health technology,
care coordination,
and community
resources, and
does not
document
practicum hours in
Capella Academic
Portal Volunteer
Experience Form.
Attempts to
describe state
board nursing
practice standards
and/or
organizational or
governmental
policies associated
with health
technology, care
coordination, and
community
resources, and/or
does not document
practicum hours in
Capella Academic
Portal Volunteer
Experience Form.
Analyzes state
board nursing
practice standards
and/or
organizational or
governmental
policies associated
with health
technology, care
coordination, and
community
resources
and documents the
practicum hours
spent with these
individuals or group
in the Capella
Academic Portal
Volunteer
Experience Form.
Conducts an astute analysis of
state board nursing practice
standards and/or organizational
or governmental policies
associated with health
technology, care coordination,
and community resources.
Clearly articulates the
implications for ethical
professional practice of applying
standards and/or policy guidance
or legislative requirements to the
problem. Documents the
practicum hours spent with these
individuals or group in the
Capella Academic Portal
Volunteer Experience Form
Support main points, Does not support Sources lack Supports main Supports main points, assertions,
12/22/23, 4:10 PMAssessing the Problem: Technology, Care Coordination, and Community Resources Considerations Scoring Guide
Page 2 of 2https://a21371-1390071.cluster223.canvas-user-content.com/courses…57&context_type=Course&download=1&id=213710000001390071&inline=1
assertions,
arguments,
conclusions, or
recommendations
with relevant and
credible evidence.
main points,
assertions,
arguments,
conclusions, or
recommendations
with relevant and
credible evidence.
relevance or
credibility, or the
evidence is not
persuasive or
explicitly
supportive of main
points, assertions,
arguments,
conclusions, or
recommendations.
points, assertions,
arguments,
conclusions, or
recommendations
with relevant and
credible evidence.
arguments, conclusions, or
recommendations with relevant,
credible, and convincing
evidence. Skillfully combines
virtually error-free source
citations with a perceptive and
coherent synthesis of the
evidence.
Apply APA style and
formatting to
scholarly writing.
Does not apply
APA style and
formatting to
scholarly writing.
Applies APA style
and formatting to
scholarly writing
incorrectly and/or
inconsistently,
detracting
noticeably from
good scholarship.
Applies APA style
and formatting to
scholarly writing.
Applies APA style and formatting
to scholarly writing. Exhibits strict
and nearly flawless adherence to
stylistic conventions, document
structure, and source
attributions.
