Order Now

Question : 151. Wheaton CompanyWheaton Company owns an apartment building that originally cost : 1245653

Accounting

 

 

151. Wheaton Company

Wheaton Company owns an apartment building that originally cost $40 million and by the end of the current period has accumulated depreciation of $10 million, with net carrying value of $30 million. Wheaton Company had originally expected to collect rentals of $3.34 million each year for 30 years before selling the building for $16 million. Unanticipated placement of a new shopping center has caused Wheaton Company to reassess the future rentals. Wheaton Company expects the building to provide rentals for only 15 more years before Wheaton will sell it. Wheaton Company uses a discount rate of 8% per year in discounting expected rentals from the building.

Wheaton now expects to receive annual rentals of $1,200,000 per year for 15 years and to sell the building for $6.0 million after 15 years; these payments, in total, have a present value of $12.2 million when discounted at 8% per year. The building’s fair value is $11.0 million today and costs to sell are $600,000.

Applying IFRS, Wheaton would record the following entry 
A. Accumulated Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   11,000,000
Apartment Building (New Valuation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10,000,000
Loss on Impairment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   19,000,000
   Apartment Building (Acquisition Cost) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   40,000,000 
B. Accumulated Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   10,000,000
Apartment Building (New Valuation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10,000,000
Loss on Impairment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   20,000,000
   Apartment Building (Acquisition Cost) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   40,000,000 
C. Accumulated Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10,000,000
Apartment Building (New Valuation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,000,000
Loss on Impairment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19,000,000
   Apartment Building (Acquisition Cost) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   40,000,000 
D. Accumulated Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10,000,000
Apartment Building (New Valuation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,000,000
Loss on Impairment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18,000,000
   Apartment Building (Acquisition Cost) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   40,000,000
E. Accumulated Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10,000,000
Apartment Building (New Valuation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,200,000
Loss on Impairment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17,800,000
   Apartment Building (Acquisition Cost) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   40,000,000

 

152. U.S. GAAP requires firms to recognize an impairment loss on a nonamortized intangible other than goodwill whenever the carrying value of the asset exceeds its 
A. undiscounted cash flows less cost to sell.
B. replacement cost less cost to sell.
C. undiscounted cash flows.
D. present value of future cash flows.
E. fair value.

 

153. Loren Company’s balance sheet shows a trade name acquired as part of a business combination with a carrying value of $30 million. The trade name has an indefinite life and therefore Loren does not amortize it. Negative publicity regarding the product carrying the trade name has reduced its fair value to $24 million and its value in use to $22 million. The entry is as follows:  
A. Loss on Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 8,000,000
   Trade Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,000,000
B. Loss on Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 6,000,000
   Trade Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,000,000
C. Loss on Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 4,000,000
   Trade Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,000,000
D. Trade Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 6,000,000
   Loss on Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,000,000
E. Trade Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 8,000,000
   Loss on Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,000,000

 

154. Evers Company’s balance sheet shows a trade name acquired as part of a business combination with a carrying value of $60 million. The trade name has an indefinite life and therefore Evers does not amortize it. Negative publicity regarding the product carrying the trade name has reduced its fair value to $48 million and its value in use to $44 million. The entry is as follows:  
A. Loss on Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,000,000
   Trade Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,000,000
B. Loss on Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .12,000,000
   Trade Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,000,000
C. Loss on Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,000,000
   Trade Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,000,000
D. Trade Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 12,000,000
   Loss on Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,000,000
E. Trade Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 16,000,000
   Loss on Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  .16,000,000

 

155. U.S. GAAP or IFRS require firms to test 
A. annually for impairment losses on goodwill.
B. whenever there is an indication of impairment due to changes in the legal or economic climate.
C. whenever there is an indication of impairment due to adverse regulatory conditions.
D. whenever there is an indication of impairment due to loss of key personnel.
E. all of the above

 

156. An impairment loss on all assets except intangibles that do not require amortization arises when 
A. the book value of the assets exceed the undiscounted cash flows.
B. the book value of the assets exceed the market value.
C. the market value of the assets exceed the undiscounted cash flows.
D. the book value of the assets exceed the discounted cash flows.
E. the book value of the assets exceed the liquidation value.

 

157. An impairment loss on all intangibles that do not require amortization, except goodwill, arises when 
A. the book value of the assets exceed the undiscounted cash flows.
B. the book value of the assets exceed the market value.
C. the market value of the assets exceed the undiscounted cash flows.
D. the book value of the assets exceed the discounted cash flows.
E. the book value of the assets exceed the liquidation value.

 

158. An impairment loss on a trademark arises when 
A. the book value of the trademark exceeds the undiscounted cash flows.
B. the book value of the trademark exceeds the market value.
C. the market value of the trademark exceeds the undiscounted cash flows.
D. the book value of the trademark exceeds the discounted cash flows.
E. the book value of the trademark exceeds the net realizable value.

 

159. An impairment loss on a brand name arises when 
A. the book value of the brand name exceeds the undiscounted cash flows.
B. the book value of the brand name exceeds the market value.
C. the market value of the brand name exceeds the undiscounted cash flows.
D. the book value of the brand name exceeds the discounted cash flows.
E. the book value of the brand name exceeds the liquidation value.

 

160. The economic value of a tangible asset may decline below its book value but an impairment loss would not be recognized when the 
A. undiscounted future cash flows exceed its book value.
B. undiscounted future cash flows exceed its market value.
C. discounted future cash flows exceed its book value.
D. discounted future cash flows exceed its market value.
E. discounted future cash flows exceed its liquidation value.

 

 

Continue to order Get a quote
Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

July 1, 2023
    

The assignment revolves around the Case Study, which may be found as a separate PDF document in the Resources section of the subject Interact site.

Objective

To apply and consolidate skills acquired in the requirement and analysis disciplines through analysis of a simple case study, and to express the results through the relevant UML diagrams.

Tasks

Part A - Use Cases (25 marks)

  1. Perform a requirements analysis for the Case Study. Express the results using the following artefacts:
    1. A use case diagram for the functional requirements of the entire system, accompanied by:
    2. Short use case descriptions for all use cases.
  2. Select the most essential (critical core) use case in the system, and produce a full use case description for it .
  3. Produce an activity diagram that expresses the workflow for that use case.

Part B - System-wide/Non-functional Requirements (15 marks)

  1. Produce a system-wide (non-functional) requirement document that documents the architectural requirements the system must address.

Part C - Use Case Realization (30 marks)

  1. Develop a domain model for the Case Study. Express your model with a class diagram, showing any inheritance and compositional relationships.
  2. Develop a use case realization showing the sequence of messages involved for the use case selected for the full description in Part A. Express this use case realization in a communication diagrams. Use the GRASP concept of a Controller class to coordinate the use case.
  3. Translate the communication diagram produced for Task 6 into an equivalent sequence diagram.

Part D - Analysis Classes(10 marks)

  1. Prepare a summary analysis class diagram showing the attributes and methods required by problem domain classes involved in the use case realized in Part C.

Part E - Object Interactions (10 marks)

  1. Prepare operation specifications for the two most complex methods contained in one of the nominated objects specified for the Case Study.

Part F - Object State (10 marks)

  1. Create a state diagram for the object chosen for Part E. Nominated objects will be listed in the Case Study.

Rationale

This assignment elicits performance of taught skills in the architecture and design areas relevant to the following learning objectives:

  • be able to analyse and validate system requirements;
  • be able to produce and validate analysis and design models for a system;
  • be able to demonstrate use of a CASE tool to document the models in a system.

Marking criteria

Use Cases

  • Is a correct concept of use cases demonstrated?
  • Are sensible use cases identified?
  • Are all use cases identified?
  • Are any extraneous use cases included?
  • Is correct UML syntax used (system box, actors,use cases, extends/includes)?
  • Are all use cases described briefly?
  • Do use cases have sensible names (identifies intent with verb)?
  • Are the short use case descriptions sensible/correct?
  • Are the most critical and important use cases correctly identified?
  • Are normal and alternate flows identified in the full use case description?
  • Are pre-conditions and post-conditions identified in the full use case description?
  • Is the full use case description consistent with the case study?
  • Is the activity diagram consistent with full use case descriptions?
  • Does the activity diagram use correct UML syntax?

System-wide/Non-functional Requirements

  • Are all system-wide/non-functional requirements identified?
  • Are sensible inferences from the system-wide requirements discussed?
  • Are business rules identified and described?
  • Are all domain objects identified?
  • Are any extraneous objects included?
  • Are inheritance relationships correctly identified?
  • Are composition/aggregation relationships correctly identified?

Use Case Realizations

  • Is there a coherent sequence of messages?
  • Are the messages consistent with Domain model?
  • Does the message sequence support the use case as described?
  • Does the communication diagram use correct UML syntax?
  • Is the sequence diagram consistent with the communication diagram?
  • Is there a coherent sequence of messages (no miracles)?
  • Is the sequence diagram consistent with the domain model?
  • Does the sequence diagram support the use case as described?
  • Does the sequence diagram use correct UML syntax?

Summary Analysis Class Diagram

  • Is the summary analysis class diagram consistent with the use case realization?
  • Is the summary analysis class diagram consistent with the domain model?
  • Are all methods required by use case realizations identified?
  • Are all attributes necessary to support methods identified?
  • Does the summary analysis class diagram use correct UML syntax?

Operation Specification

  • Is the operation specification consistent with the use case realization?
  • Is the operation specification consistent with the domain model?
  • Are pre-conditions identified and specified?
  • Are post-conditions identified and specified?
  • Are parameter types and rangesspecified?
  • Is business logic specified?

State Diagram

  • Is a correct concept of states and transitions displayed?
  • Is the state diagram consistent with the use case realization?
  • Are sensible additional transitions identified?
default image
July 1, 2023
    

The assignment revolves around the Case Study, which may be found as a separate PDF document in the Resources section of the subject Interact site.

Objective

To apply and consolidate skills acquired in the requirement and analysis disciplines through analysis of a simple case study, and to express the results through the relevant UML diagrams.

Tasks

Part A - Use Cases (25 marks)

  1. Perform a requirements analysis for the Case Study. Express the results using the following artefacts:
    1. A use case diagram for the functional requirements of the entire system, accompanied by:
    2. Short use case descriptions for all use cases.
  2. Select the most essential (critical core) use case in the system, and produce a full use case description for it .
  3. Produce an activity diagram that expresses the workflow for that use case.

Part B - System-wide/Non-functional Requirements (15 marks)

  1. Produce a system-wide (non-functional) requirement document that documents the architectural requirements the system must address.

Part C - Use Case Realization (30 marks)

  1. Develop a domain model for the Case Study. Express your model with a class diagram, showing any inheritance and compositional relationships.
  2. Develop a use case realization showing the sequence of messages involved for the use case selected for the full description in Part A. Express this use case realization in a communication diagrams. Use the GRASP concept of a Controller class to coordinate the use case.
  3. Translate the communication diagram produced for Task 6 into an equivalent sequence diagram.

Part D - Analysis Classes(10 marks)

  1. Prepare a summary analysis class diagram showing the attributes and methods required by problem domain classes involved in the use case realized in Part C.

Part E - Object Interactions (10 marks)

  1. Prepare operation specifications for the two most complex methods contained in one of the nominated objects specified for the Case Study.

Part F - Object State (10 marks)

  1. Create a state diagram for the object chosen for Part E. Nominated objects will be listed in the Case Study.

Rationale

This assignment elicits performance of taught skills in the architecture and design areas relevant to the following learning objectives:

  • be able to analyse and validate system requirements;
  • be able to produce and validate analysis and design models for a system;
  • be able to demonstrate use of a CASE tool to document the models in a system.

Marking criteria

Use Cases

  • Is a correct concept of use cases demonstrated?
  • Are sensible use cases identified?
  • Are all use cases identified?
  • Are any extraneous use cases included?
  • Is correct UML syntax used (system box, actors,use cases, extends/includes)?
  • Are all use cases described briefly?
  • Do use cases have sensible names (identifies intent with verb)?
  • Are the short use case descriptions sensible/correct?
  • Are the most critical and important use cases correctly identified?
  • Are normal and alternate flows identified in the full use case description?
  • Are pre-conditions and post-conditions identified in the full use case description?
  • Is the full use case description consistent with the case study?
  • Is the activity diagram consistent with full use case descriptions?
  • Does the activity diagram use correct UML syntax?

System-wide/Non-functional Requirements

  • Are all system-wide/non-functional requirements identified?
  • Are sensible inferences from the system-wide requirements discussed?
  • Are business rules identified and described?
  • Are all domain objects identified?
  • Are any extraneous objects included?
  • Are inheritance relationships correctly identified?
  • Are composition/aggregation relationships correctly identified?

Use Case Realizations

  • Is there a coherent sequence of messages?
  • Are the messages consistent with Domain model?
  • Does the message sequence support the use case as described?
  • Does the communication diagram use correct UML syntax?
  • Is the sequence diagram consistent with the communication diagram?
  • Is there a coherent sequence of messages (no miracles)?
  • Is the sequence diagram consistent with the domain model?
  • Does the sequence diagram support the use case as described?
  • Does the sequence diagram use correct UML syntax?

Summary Analysis Class Diagram

  • Is the summary analysis class diagram consistent with the use case realization?
  • Is the summary analysis class diagram consistent with the domain model?
  • Are all methods required by use case realizations identified?
  • Are all attributes necessary to support methods identified?
  • Does the summary analysis class diagram use correct UML syntax?

Operation Specification

  • Is the operation specification consistent with the use case realization?
  • Is the operation specification consistent with the domain model?
  • Are pre-conditions identified and specified?
  • Are post-conditions identified and specified?
  • Are parameter types and rangesspecified?
  • Is business logic specified?

State Diagram

  • Is a correct concept of states and transitions displayed?
  • Is the state diagram consistent with the use case realization?
  • Are sensible additional transitions identified?
default image
July 1, 2023
    

The assignment revolves around the Case Study, which may be found as a separate PDF document in the Resources section of the subject Interact site.

Objective

To apply and consolidate skills acquired in the requirement and analysis disciplines through analysis of a simple case study, and to express the results through the relevant UML diagrams.

Tasks

Part A - Use Cases (25 marks)

  1. Perform a requirements analysis for the Case Study. Express the results using the following artefacts:
    1. A use case diagram for the functional requirements of the entire system, accompanied by:
    2. Short use case descriptions for all use cases.
  2. Select the most essential (critical core) use case in the system, and produce a full use case description for it .
  3. Produce an activity diagram that expresses the workflow for that use case.

Part B - System-wide/Non-functional Requirements (15 marks)

  1. Produce a system-wide (non-functional) requirement document that documents the architectural requirements the system must address.

Part C - Use Case Realization (30 marks)

  1. Develop a domain model for the Case Study. Express your model with a class diagram, showing any inheritance and compositional relationships.
  2. Develop a use case realization showing the sequence of messages involved for the use case selected for the full description in Part A. Express this use case realization in a communication diagrams. Use the GRASP concept of a Controller class to coordinate the use case.
  3. Translate the communication diagram produced for Task 6 into an equivalent sequence diagram.

Part D - Analysis Classes(10 marks)

  1. Prepare a summary analysis class diagram showing the attributes and methods required by problem domain classes involved in the use case realized in Part C.

Part E - Object Interactions (10 marks)

  1. Prepare operation specifications for the two most complex methods contained in one of the nominated objects specified for the Case Study.

Part F - Object State (10 marks)

  1. Create a state diagram for the object chosen for Part E. Nominated objects will be listed in the Case Study.

Rationale

This assignment elicits performance of taught skills in the architecture and design areas relevant to the following learning objectives:

  • be able to analyse and validate system requirements;
  • be able to produce and validate analysis and design models for a system;
  • be able to demonstrate use of a CASE tool to document the models in a system.

Marking criteria

Use Cases

  • Is a correct concept of use cases demonstrated?
  • Are sensible use cases identified?
  • Are all use cases identified?
  • Are any extraneous use cases included?
  • Is correct UML syntax used (system box, actors,use cases, extends/includes)?
  • Are all use cases described briefly?
  • Do use cases have sensible names (identifies intent with verb)?
  • Are the short use case descriptions sensible/correct?
  • Are the most critical and important use cases correctly identified?
  • Are normal and alternate flows identified in the full use case description?
  • Are pre-conditions and post-conditions identified in the full use case description?
  • Is the full use case description consistent with the case study?
  • Is the activity diagram consistent with full use case descriptions?
  • Does the activity diagram use correct UML syntax?

System-wide/Non-functional Requirements

  • Are all system-wide/non-functional requirements identified?
  • Are sensible inferences from the system-wide requirements discussed?
  • Are business rules identified and described?
  • Are all domain objects identified?
  • Are any extraneous objects included?
  • Are inheritance relationships correctly identified?
  • Are composition/aggregation relationships correctly identified?

Use Case Realizations

  • Is there a coherent sequence of messages?
  • Are the messages consistent with Domain model?
  • Does the message sequence support the use case as described?
  • Does the communication diagram use correct UML syntax?
  • Is the sequence diagram consistent with the communication diagram?
  • Is there a coherent sequence of messages (no miracles)?
  • Is the sequence diagram consistent with the domain model?
  • Does the sequence diagram support the use case as described?
  • Does the sequence diagram use correct UML syntax?

Summary Analysis Class Diagram

  • Is the summary analysis class diagram consistent with the use case realization?
  • Is the summary analysis class diagram consistent with the domain model?
  • Are all methods required by use case realizations identified?
  • Are all attributes necessary to support methods identified?
  • Does the summary analysis class diagram use correct UML syntax?

Operation Specification

  • Is the operation specification consistent with the use case realization?
  • Is the operation specification consistent with the domain model?
  • Are pre-conditions identified and specified?
  • Are post-conditions identified and specified?
  • Are parameter types and rangesspecified?
  • Is business logic specified?

State Diagram

  • Is a correct concept of states and transitions displayed?
  • Is the state diagram consistent with the use case realization?
  • Are sensible additional transitions identified?
default image
Essay (any type)
August 22, 2022
    

They have a magnificent team. These people are always kind and willing to listen to your concerns or issues. Better yet, your assignment is always ready before the time, they usually send you a draft to double-check before they finalize your paper.

 

default image
Customer #32567
Zoology, 8 Pages
Case study
August 22, 2022
    

Completed quickly and followed instructions given. Grammar, spelling, etc. was all good as well. Thank you so much! Will hire in the future.

default image
Customer #30093
Biology (and other Life Sciences), 6 pages
Presentation/PPT
August 22, 2022
    

The work has not been graded but I like the output that was submitted to me. Is it possible for the same prof to do the next assignment I will be submitting? If possible, I will greatly appreciate it.

default image
Customer #37612
Computer science, 8 pages
Journal article
August 22, 2022
    

My third using this writer and absolutely amazing work! Very punctual and very understanding.

default image
Customer #34820
Agriculture, 4 pages
Article
August 22, 2022
    

Outstanding job in writing my paper. I am always thrill to receive a well written paper that follows the instructions and the thorough details put into my paper. The quality of this paper is beyond awesome. Thank you so much.

default image
Customer #17907
Technology, 5 pages
Thesis/Thesis chapter
August 22, 2022
    

I absolutely love this writer! He/she always cranks out a fabulous paper and follows the assignment guidelines/instructions perfectly. Thanks again for always providing such quality work!!!

default image
Customer #32146
Economics, 9 pages
Research paper
August 22, 2022
    

It took some time to achieve the product I was looking for, but we eventually got there. I do feel like a lot of hard work was put into this, and it even exceeded the page requirement. I'm pretty pleased overall. I give my thanks.

default image
Customer #22371
Ecology, 5 pages
Lab Report
August 22, 2022
    

Outstanding work! This writer followed every instruction and my paper came back with an A! I recommend to anyone needing help! Thank you again ❤️

default image
Customer #13712
Nursing, 6 pages
Outline
August 22, 2022
    

Outstanding job in writing my paper. I am always thrill to receive a well written paper that follows the instructions and the thorough details put into my paper. The quality of this paper is beyond awesome. Thank you so much.

default image
Customer #267302
IT, Web, 6 pages
Essay (any type)
August 22, 2022
    

Made 100% on both the outline and the paper. Quick turnaround time and my writer responded within 30 min or less. Any edits my instructor needed, my writer was patient and worked diligently to accomplish the task. Would recommend my writer to anyone!

default image
Customer #14472
International Trade, 8 pages
Essay (any type)
August 5, 2021
    

You are making my life so much easier! I am a single mom that works and goes to school. You guys are helping me with my projects so I can have more free time with my son.

default image
customer #13832
Tourism, 3 pages
Annotated Bibliography
August 5, 2021
    

I was sure it can fit in a single page but the next time I will add one more page because I am impressed with your professionalism and quality. Will use many more times till I graduate.

default image
customer #12008
Management, 7 pages
Essay (any type)
August 5, 2021
    

Simple registration and quality services. I just ordered one paper, and it was good enough to pass the exam. That is what I need the most. Good job.

default image
customer #16257
Communication, 4 pages
Research Proposal
August 5, 2021
    

I couldn’t finish my freaking essay, and I was very desperate. A friend of mine sent me a link, and that is how I found out about you guys. Thank you for professional tips and editing. Now, I understand how to write it properly.

default image
customer #17128
Law, 5 pages
Reflection
August 5, 2021
    

I’m so grateful to you since you managed to complete my term paper in one day! You are definitely the best company ever!

default image
customer #16528
Public Relations, 7 pages
Essay (any type)
August 5, 2021
    

I am sure on your ability to provide any type of paper I will order. I wish I could develop that skill your writers have to be able to have a flow of ideas and excellent sequencing of thoughts in writing.

default image
customer #19552
Medicine, 5 pages
Coursework
August 5, 2021
    

I ordered a thesis paper and was satisfied. All the guys were polite and highly professional, even when I wrote to them several times per day. Thanks for your passion!

default image
customer #20376
Nursing, 6 pages
Discussion Essay
August 5, 2021
    

I turned to the service twice, and my papers always were beyond the expectations. To tell the truth, I was ready to find some grammar errors or something like that. However, everything was neat and tidy.

default image
customer #18529
Marketing, 1 page
August 5, 2021

My friend recommended Doctor My Essay to me. It is convenient! Now we both turn to the service periodically coz wanna save some time and use it more effectively. I know that while I’m developing my startup, an expert is working on paper. Time management in work!

default image
Research Paper
August 5, 2021
    

I write all paper works by myself but have some problems with literacy. Actually, I have enormous problems because English is not my native language. However, with proofreading from Doctor My Essay, I can relax and don’t be ashamed of mistakes.

default image
customer #12924
Business, 7 pages
Argumentative Essay
August 5, 2021
    

Your ability to write concisely is a finding. The paper has a solid argument. It’s clear that the writer understood central claim about the topic. He also presented original ideas to consider.

default image
customer #19304
Management, 3 pages
Coursework
August 5, 2021
    

That paper got the highest grade in my class and the professor thinks I’m the smartest student. Lol.

default image
customer #12387
Accounting, 6 pages
Essay (any type)
August 5, 2021
    

I was convinced that paper writing services are the fiction for naive students. But when it came to my research paper that was to be composed in 72 hours, I had no other options. I made the right choice when I ordered it from you!

default image
customer #12924
Ethics, 4 pages
Business Plan
August 5, 2021
    

I was also satisfied with the service. Usually, I write everything by myself, but this time ( I have no idea how it happens!) I missed the deadline. My writer was very responsible, wrote the essay quickly, and kept the instructions. Nice to know that such experts exist!

default image
customer #15677
Marketing, 10 pages
Annotated Bibliography
August 5, 2021
    

It is really affordable! The prices start from 9$, which is an excellent proposal on the market. Recently I worked with another service that took much more money and provided lower quality papers.

default image
customer #11234
Sociology, 9 pages
Research proposal
August 5, 2021
    

I am absolutely satisfied. I am first timer here. Revision was made quickly, and the author met my expectations. Thanks a lot. Paper is phenomenal.

default image
customer #15327
Economics, 5 pages
Essay (any type)
August 5, 2021
    

Having heard a lot of negative reviews about such services, I was a bit skeptical. However, our cooperation with Doctor My Essay was without pitfalls. I made two comments about the final work, and they re-wrote some parts very promptly. I am satisfied and will turn to them in the future.

default image
customer #17823
Human Resource Management, 2 pages
Research paper
August 5, 2021
    

It was my first experience in online ordering, and I was a bit nervous. However, this was for nothing. I’ve got a high mark!

default image
customer #12372
Public Relations, 3 pages
Dissertation
August 5, 2021
    

I understand that buying essays is a doubtful thing. You don’t put effort, don’t represent your ideas… However, I don’t perceive Doctor My Essay as a standard service. They don’t sell papers. They share high expertise!

default image
customer #12376
Journal article, 20 pages
Coursework
August 5, 2021
    

According to my previous experience, this service is really the best. They support the client and have competitive writers. I give them a perfect score!

default image
customer #19266
Political Science, 6 pages
Admission Essay
August 5, 2021
    

Nice service! It is cool that you can use the calculator on the main page and understand the price policy. For me, it is a huge plus!

default image
customer #11437
Tourism, 1 page
Discussion Essay
August 5, 2021
    

Thanks to God I found this service! If I didn’t send my research to the teacher on time, he would eat me. I tell you! However, with doctor my essay service, I met the deadline, and I am still alive.

default image
customer #12692
Philosophy, 5 pages
Report
August 5, 2021
    

Your service is excellent! Convenient and not expensive. Thanks for that!

default image
customer #10923
Psychology, 4 pages
Essay (any type)
August 5, 2021
    

If you have problems with time management, just like me, you need to cooperate with Doctor My Essay. Once you registered and made the order, you understand how easier it makes your life! Everything is online: ordering, communication… You can control the process everywhere and be sure that an expert will provide a high-level paper.

default image
customer #17823
Business, 8 pages

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more