Question : 21. Dorffman Inc. has a $18,000 favorable flexible budget variance for : 1291604

 

21. Dorffman Inc. has a $18,000 favorable flexible budget variance for May. Which of the following statements is true, if May’s actual net operating income was $72,000? 
A. Dorffman’s static budget must have showed a net operating income of $54,000.
B. Dorffman’s static budget must have showed a net operating income of $90,000.
C. Dorffman’s flexible budget must have showed a net operating income of $54,000.
D. Dorffman’s flexible budget must have showed a net operating income of $90,000.

 

22. Prevo Products Inc. has a $15,000 unfavorable flexible budget variance for July. Which of the following statements is true, if July’s actual net operating income was $300,000? 
A. Prevo’s static budget must have showed a net operating income of $315,000.
B. Prevo’s static budget must have showed a net operating income of $285,000.
C. Prevo’s flexible budget must have showed a net operating income of $315,000.
D. Prevo’s flexible budget must have showed a net operating income of $285,000.

 

23. Taylor Products Inc. has an $5,000 unfavorable flexible budget variance for October. Which of the following statements is true, if October’s flexible budget net operating income was $175,000? 
A. Taylor’s static budget must have showed a net operating income of $180,000.
B. Taylor’s static budget must have showed a net operating income of $170,000.
C. Taylor’s actual net operating income must have been $180,000.
D. Taylor’s actual net operating income must have been $170,000.

 

24. Smith Corporation has a $6,000 favorable flexible budget variance for January. Which of the following statements is true, if January’s flexible budget net operating income was $100,000? 
A. Smith’s static budget must have showed a net operating income of $106,000.
B. Smith’s static budget must have showed a net operating income of $94,000.
C. Smith’s actual net operating income must have been $106,000.
D. Smith’s actual net operating income must have been $94,000.

 

25. Coppelli Inc.
In early 2012, Coppelli Inc. had budgeted for the production and sale of 24,000 units. The standard sales price and variable costs per unit were budgeted to be $6.00 and $2.00, respectively. Actual sales for 2012 totaled 25,300 units, and the actual sales price and variable costs per unit were $6.50 and $2.10, respectively. Both budgeted and actual fixed costs were $30,000.

Refer to the Coppelli Inc. information above. What was Coppelli’s sales price variance for 2012? 
A. $12,650 F
B. $12,650 U
C. $12,000 F
D. $12,000 U

 

26. Fox Manufacturing
At the beginning of the year, Fox Manufacturing had budgeted for the production and sale of 24,000 units. The standard sales price and variable costs per unit were budgeted to be $20.00 and $8.00, respectively. Actual sales for the year totaled 21,000 units, and the actual sales price and variable costs per unit were $19.50 and $8.00, respectively. Both budgeted and actual fixed costs were $20,000.

Refer to the Fox Manufacturing information above. What was Fox’s sales price variance for the year? 
A. $10,500 F
B. $10,500 U
C. $12,000 F
D. $12,000 U

 

27. Lukey Products has an unfavorable materials usage variance. Which of the following would be the most likely reason for this variance? 
A. The company under budgeted the quantity of material to be used for each unit.
B. The company purchased material at a price for less than what was expected.
C. The company budgeted for a lower sales volume than what actually occurred.
D. The company did not use up all the material that had been purchased.

 

28. Chilé Products Ltd.
Chilé Products Ltd. bottles and sells hot pepper sauce. In 2012, the company had expected to sell 65,000 bottles but actually bottled and sold 80,000 bottles. The standard direct materials cost for each bottle is $.24 comprised of .60 ounces at a cost of $.40 per ounce. During 2012, 52,000 ounces of material were purchased out of which 46,000 ounces were used at a cost of $.37 per ounce.

Refer to the Chilé Products Ltd. information above. The direct materials price variance for 2012 was: 
A. $1,560 F.
B. $1,560 U.
C. $1,380 F.
D. $1,380 U.

 

29. Chilé Products Ltd.
Chilé Products Ltd. bottles and sells hot pepper sauce. In 2012, the company had expected to sell 65,000 bottles but actually bottled and sold 80,000 bottles. The standard direct materials cost for each bottle is $.24 comprised of .60 ounces at a cost of $.40 per ounce. During 2012, 52,000 ounces of material were purchased out of which 46,000 ounces were used at a cost of $.37 per ounce.

Refer to the Chilé Products Ltd. information above. The direct materials usage variance for 2012 was: 
A. $   800 F.
B. $   800 U.
C. $1,600 F.
D. $1,600 U.

 

30. Mystic Falls Inc.
Mystic Falls Inc. bottles and sells a popular soft drink. In 2011, the company had expected to sell 1,000,000 bottles but actually bottled and sold 900,000 bottles. The standard direct materials cost for each bottle is $.40 comprised of 10 ounces at a cost of $.04 per ounce. During 2011, 10,000,000 ounces of material were purchased out of which 9,200,000 ounces were used at a cost of $.05 per ounce.

Refer to the Mystic Falls Inc. information above. The direct materials price variance for 2011 was: 
A. $  92,000 U.
B. $  92,000 F.
C. $100,000 U.
D. $100,000 F.

 

 

 

 

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more