Question :
11) The best economic case one can make for an : 1303555
11) The best economic case one can make for an active industrial policy involves
A) the national security argument.
B) the technological spillover argument.
C) the environment preservation argument.
D) the high value added argument.
E) raising the national income.
12) Spencer and Brander’s model highlights the existence of
A) aircraft industries.
B) excess returns present in highly competitive markets.
C) excess returns, or rents, available in non-competitive markets.
D) the futility of government bureaucrats’ attempts to build an airplane.
E) natural advantages in foreign technology firms.
13) Spencer and Brander’s model highlights the conventional assumption that
A) government involvement in business or in the economy tends to fail.
B) government subsidies tend to waste taxpayer’s money.
C) government subsidies cannot create a successfully competing export.
D) government tends to distort when it displaces Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand.
E) government subsidies can produce profits that exceed the subsidy’s value.
14) The reason Airbus succeeded in the Brander Spencer example is that
A) Boeing made the first move in this strategic game.
B) Europeans tend to be better strategists than corn-fed Americans.
C) the Airbus actually was a better plane than the Boeing 747.
D) U.S. laws actually prohibit U.S. exporters from bribing foreign officials.
E) the subsidy removed the advantage that Boeing gained with their head start in production.
15) The reason Airbus succeeded in the Brander Spencer example is that
A) the European government made an explicit subsidy offer, but the U.S. government did not.
B) Airbus’ prices were better when adjusted for quality and warranty services.
C) Boeing traditionally refused to undertake any exchange rate risk in its transactions.
D) the U.S. acted in accordance with its ideological reliance on market solutions, whereas the Europeans ignored market and technological factors.
E) the Airbus plane benefited from more advanced technology.
16) The argument that strategic planning is not likely to be practical due to insufficient information means that
A) because of trade secrets, the government does not know true cost relationships in any given industry.
B) if the government had all the relevant information in a given industry then it could decide whether a subsidy would enhance the public’s welfare.
C) even if the government had all the relevant information in a given industry, it still could not decide whether a subsidy would enhance the public’s welfare.
D) due to recent cuts in the Department of the Census’ sampling budgets, industry surveys are no longer reliable, so that there is no way to determine if a subsidy is in the public’s interest.
E) the government would need to employ its intelligence agencies in order to gain a complete understanding of the market.
17) The invocation of beggar-thy-neighbor arguments with respect to industrial policies
A) strengthens the argument for subsidies.
B) makes sense if the international Keynesian multipliers exceed unity.
C) applies only to rich countries most of whose trade partners are very poor countries.
D) weakens the argument for subsidies.
E) does not apply to rich countries who can influence relative world prices.
18) When the WTO met in Seattle to initiate a further move towards free international trade, thousands of activists met
A) in order to promote the WTO’s goals of “Trade-not Aid.”
B) in order to laud the WTO policy orientation which would bust local monopolies and therefore help ordinary relatively poor consumers everywhere.
C) in order to laud the WTO policy of disallowing government sweetheart deals, which typically meant that corrupt governments subsidized their in-laws’ conglomerates on the backs of poor taxpayers.
D) in order to support the WTO efforts of bringing about a universal shift of resources in poor countries to higher efficiency and productivity uses, which would raise the real incomes of everyone.
E) in order to protest WTO free trade policies that they believed hurt workers.
19) When one applies the Heckscher-Ohlin model of trade to the issue of trade-related income redistributions, one must conclude that North South trade, such as U.S.-Mexico trade
A) must help low skill workers on both sides of the border.
B) is likely to hurt high-skilled workers in the U.S.
C) is likely to hurt low-skilled workers in the U.S.
D) is likely to hurt low-skilled workers in Mexico.
E) is likely to help highly skilled workers in Mexico.
20) The evidence usually cited to prove that globalization hurts workers in developing countries
A) is inconclusive due to poor statistical design of the underlying samples.
B) is inconclusive due to the poorly funded Central Statistical Office of Mexico.
C) is inconclusive due to the ambiguous theoretical implications of the findings.
D) is conclusive.
E) does not take into account the Heckscher-Ohlin model.
