Liberty university educ 750 quiz 5

 

Liberty University EDUC 750 QUIZ 5

EDUC 750 QUIZ 5

·         Question 1

3 out of 3 points

Individuals and groups who have some bias of concern with a program are called:

·         Question 2

3 out of 3 points

Uncooperative participants and unused reports are potential consequences of not being responsive to program stakeholders.

·         Question 3

3 out of 3 points

Evaluation research is best understood in relation to:

·         Question 4

3 out of 3 points

A summative evaluation is synonymous with impact evaluation.

·         Question 5

3 out of 3 points

Evaluability assessments often rely on _____ methods.

·         Question 6

3 out of 3 points

Who decides which questions will be studied in the stakeholder orientation?

·         Question 7

3 out of 3 points

The evaluation of Project Teams used a program theory approach.

·         Question 8

3 out of 3 points

Which of the following is NOT a type of program evaluation?

·         Question 9

3 out of 3 points

Qualitative methods are typically preferred when investigating _____ research questions.

·         Question 10

3 out of 3 points

Meta-analysis involves multiple studies examining myriad questions.

·         Question 11

0 out of 3 points

The choice of data collection method should be guided by:

·         Question 12

3 out of 3 points

Factorial surveys combine features that maximize _____ with the features of surveys that maximize _____.

·         Question 13

3 out of 3 points

When would the generalizability of a historical method likely be enhanced?

·         Question 14

3 out of 3 points

A standardized measure that captures the association between the independent and dependent variable across multiple studies is called the:

·         Question 15

3 out of 3 points

Carolyn Needleman’s (1981) study of how probation officers screened cases in a New York juvenile court emphasized the importance of mixed methods. What was her surprising finding?

·         Question 16

3 out of 3 points

Odom et al.’s (2006) observational data were transformed into quantitative data using the _____ procedure.

·         Question 17

3 out of 3 points

All action research performed by a practitioner can be termed teacher research.

·         Question 18

3 out of 3 points

According to Banford (1996), why did the writing workshop succeed for Maricar?

·         Question 19

3 out of 3 points

Howard Banford began his study with the premise that writing workshop does not work.

·         Question 20

3 out of 3 points

Joseph Kelly’s research question involved students’ use of:

·         Question 21

3 out of 3 points

In educational action research, the target of the research is:

·         Question 22

3 out of 3 points

According to Cochran-Smith and Lytle’s typology, journals fall into which category?

·         Question 23

3 out of 3 points

The use of multiple data sources is an important guarantor of validity in teacher research.

·         Question 24

3 out of 3 points

Cochran-Smith and Lytle (1993) identified two categories of teacher research. Which was one of these categories?

·         Question 25

3 out of 3 points

Which concept is at the heart of the Caro-Bruce et al. (2009) study on the Madison Metropolitan School District?

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more