respond to at least one peers as follows:
- What reactions did you and your peer have in common?
- Give two additional recommendations that your peer might consider when addressing some of the challenges of the collaborative process.
Introduction
The collaborative meeting, this week brings several stakeholders from different disciplines together, on behalf of Joseph Lansing. Joseph, was removed from his foster care home and the most recent incident, involves discussion of Joseph with his classmates and his thoughts of bringing a gun to school. Joseph was removed from Mrs. Porter class, after her learning from the other students, the possibility of Joseph, bringing a gun to school. Through the collaborative process, it takes each stakeholder, listening to the views and input of each member of the team. The collaborative meeting, expressed various viewpoints of issues on what the next step should be and the plan of action moving forward for Joseph Lansing. Throughout this case study, Joseph communicated the best way he knew how; through expressing his intentions with his classmates. Communicating ideals and thoughts on behalf of the client/clients and working through the collaborative process on behalf of the client will help determine a great outlook for the client.
Body
During the collaboration process there a different view points on how intervention should take place for the client. According to (Woodside & McClam, 2015), human services professionals have to be committed to seeking out diverse opinions, perspectives and ideas about a problem to be addressed. My thoughts, were in this case and the question asked always, “What is best for the client”. Keeping the client (Joseph) in Samuel Elementary and allowing him to finish the year, would be best decision from this learners’ perspective. Joseph, dealt with many circumstances, at an early age. Once the problem is accurately, identified and Joseph strengths determined, the next step him through the collaborator efforts of the team will be intervention.
The collaboration relationship among team members on Joseph’s behalf is one that requires great communication skills among the team. In order for, the dialogue to begin this week, different viewpoints were presented. According to (Woodside & McClam, 2015), each discipline brings a unique perspective to the understanding of the nature of the individual, families, and groups of people.
Conclusion
Through enlisting different viewpoints for her team, this will according to (Woodside, McClam, 2015), bring clarity and understanding of the overall problems (s). The integrated synthesis of viewpoints presented at the meeting is that intervention and support is needed for Joseph. Putting the client’s needs first is most pertinent throughout the helping process. My thoughts are, Dr. Manning, views represents my values to fight and advocate on behalf always for the client. Each discipline brings a unique perspective to the understanding of the nature of the individual, families, and groups of people, (Woodside & McClam, 2016). Throughout the helping process, the client needs, are always first, (p.126). Advocating, for the clients well-being and for social justice is a professional imperative, (Gladding & Newsome, 2014).
Reference:
Woodside, M. R., & McClam, T. (2015). An introduction to human services (8th
ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning. ISBN: 9781285749907.
http://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/HS5993/case1Collaboration/case1Collaboration.asp
Response/ Brenda
