Post one thread of at least 800 – 1000 words 

Then post two (2) replies of at least 450–600 words 

For each thread, there are multiple questions based off the case study; each question response must be supported with at least 1 peer-reviewed source.Each thread must also include 1 biblical application/integration.

 Each response must be supported with at least 2 peer-reviewed sources and include 1 biblical application/integration.

 Note that the biblical application/integration cannot be more than 10% of the thread or replies.

From the Ohio Lottery case, answer the following questions:

1. Detail the overall research design in the Ohio Lottery case (See Exhibit OL1). What are the advantages and disadvantages of this design?
2. Evaluate the MET process (Exhibit OL-2). What are some of the strengths and weaknesses of the MET technique?
3. What measurement scales are used in the sample questions provided (Exhibit OL-3)? Why might the lottery attitude and lottery importance questions have presented the most challenge to the professional researchers?
4. Using text Exhibit 12-2, map out the likely quantitative instrument content.
5. The survey contained several questions that would alert the researchers that the participant was not taking the research process seriously (see case exhibit OL-3). Is this a good or a poor idea? Why?
6. Evaluate the MET discussion guide for the Ohio Lottery Research.