Answer this case study , Follow all the instructions , properly citation, reference NO PLAGIARISM.
·
In 1978, three teenage girls were killed in a rear-end collision that resulted in the explosion of the struck Ford Pinto’s gas tank. Students will the use the facts of the case and their ethical judgment to determine the best course of action for Ford to take.
·
Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2014). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
§
§ Case study, Pinto Fires, pp.63-67 in the textbook.
Study and Learning Center. (2006). Answering a case study. Retrieved from https://www.dlsweb.rmit.edu.au/lsu/content/2_assessmenttasks/assess_tuts/case%20study_LL/answering.html
·
Review the process of analyzing a case study in Answering a Case Study, https://www.dlsweb.rmit.edu.au/lsu/content/2_assessmenttasks/assess_tuts/case%20study_LL/answering.html
Then review the case study on pages 63-67 of the text. You will apply your analysis from the article on it.
1. . Proper introduction and conclusion to paper
2. Determine the issues raised in the readings, and in your personal observation and study, that you will focus on in your case study analysis.
a. Identified the elements of the case study.
b. Identify the methods of research used in the case study.
3. . Make an argument for the course of action that Ford should take
4. Read the case study carefully, and gather from it information you will need for your analysis.
5. . Information organized intelligently and holistically (i.e. not simply answers to questions)
6. Decide what course of action Ford should have taken. Describe your reasoning that led to your position and conclusion.
·
The following rubric indicates those areas you should be focusing on in preparing your assignment, and how the instructor will weigh these components relative to one another.
Content (60%)
ACTIVITY/COMPETENCIES DEMONSTRATED
% of Final Grade
1.
a. Identified the elements of the case study.
/10
b. Identify the methods of research used in the case study.
/10
c. Evaluate the ethical elements of the case study methods in this case.
/15
d. Support the paper with appropriate sources, including at least two academic sources
/15
e. Make an argument for the course of action that Ford should take.
/10
2.
Communication (25%)
a. Uses language clearly and effectively
/10
b. Information organized intelligently and holistically (i.e. not simply answers to questions)
/10
c. Proper introduction and conclusion to paper
/5
3
Attention to Detail (15%)
a. APA Formatting (title, headings & references)
/10
b. Spelling and grammar
/5
Total
/100
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more