Cyber ethics | Computer Science homework help

Uncategorized

Chapter 9 – Quiz 9

Instructions: There are four (4) topic areas listed below that are designed to measure your knowledge level specific to learning outcome (LO 9) shown in your course syllabus. You must respond to #4 and select any other two of these topic areas providing appropriate responses in essay form. In most cases the topic area has several components. Each must be addressed to properly satisfy requirements.

State-wide and in most professional industries, there has been a mandate that college students be more proficient in their writing. While this is not a writing class, all writing assignments will be graded for grammar, syntax and typographical correctness to help address this mandate.

Pay attention to what you are being asked to do (see Grading Rubric below). For example, to describe does not mean to list, but to tell about or illustrate in more than two or three sentences, providing appropriate arguments for your responses using theories discussed in our text. Be sure to address all parts of the topic question as most have multiple parts. A verifiable current event (less than 4 years old) relevant to at least one of the topics you respond to is a fundamental component of your quiz as well. You cannot use information from the text book or any book/article by the author of the text book as a current event. Make sure that your reference has a date of publication. For each chapter quiz and final quiz you are required to find and include at least one reference and reference citation to a current event less than 4 years old (a reference with no date (n.d.) is not acceptable) in answer to at least one question. This requires a reference citation in the text of your answer and a reference at the end of the question to which the reference applies. You must include some information obtained from the reference in your answer. The references must be found on the internet and you must include a URL in your reference so that the reference can be verified.

You should type your responses directly under the appropriate question. Be sure to include your name on your quiz. Only the first three (3) questions with answers will be graded. Include your name in the document filename. Your completed quiz must be uploaded into the appropriate eCollege Dropbox, no later than 11:59pm on the due date. Do well.

1. (a) Have DRM systems gone too far, as some critics claim? Recall the 2005 Sony BMG copy protection case involving the controversial “rootkit” problem (examined in Scenario 9-2). (b) Should Sony have been allowed to use a DRM system that cannot easily be uninstalled when circumstances warrant it? (c) Do companies like Sony need strong DRM systems to ensure the protection of their intellectual property rights? (d) What kind of compromise position might be reached between users and content owners in the ongoing debate about DRM systems? Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in support of your responses. (comprehension)

2. (a) Describe some concerns involving pornography in cyberspace. (b) Why was the Communications Decency Act (CDA), sections which were designed to protect children from concerns about pornography on the Internet, so controversial? (c) Why was it eventually struck down? (d) Why were both COPA and (portions of) CPPA struck down as being unconstitutional? (e) Should they have been declared unconstitutional? Defend your answer. Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in support of your responses. (comprehension)

3 (a) What is sexting, and what challenges does it pose for prosecuting current child pornography laws? Recall the examination of the sexting incident at Greensburg Salem High School, PA (in Scenario 9-3). (b) Should the teens involved in that case have been subject to felony charges under existing child pornography laws? Explain. Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in support of your responses. (knowledge)

4 (a) Describe some of the issues underlying the free speech vs. censorship debate in cyberspace. (b) What is meant by “free speech”? (c) Describe the differences between what Catudal calls “censorship by suppression” and what he calls “censorship by deterrence”? (d) Is this distinction useful for understanding some of the complex issues surrounding censorship? Defend your answer and please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in support of your responses. (comprehension) LO 9

Grading Rubric for Quizzes

Grading criterion Unit Points Total Points

Uploaded to correct Dropbox 2 2

Submitted on time 15 15

Document Filename:

Your Last Name,first and middle initial with correct quiz number 5 5

(Example only: Creider_RD_q1)

Rationally expressed opinions, experiences (personal or observed), 8

arguments and premises (where appropriate) to support responses

(did not simply restate/summarize author/textbook

Clearly presented classical ethics theories relative to topic 8

Included ‘URL’ for appropriate verifiable current event 12 28

(i.e., example of topic being discussed WITH EXPLANATION)

NOTE: Must be less than 4 years old

Grammatically correct and appropriate tone 10

(professional, non offensive language)

Typographically correct 10 20

Included full citations as needed 3

Used correct APA format 7 10

Addressed each item within selected topic area 20 20

Maximum grade 100 100

Continue to order Get a quote

July 1, 2023

leguminous grains. None of the New World’s complex

societies—Incas, Mayas, or Aztecs—acquired the first two

traits, but their cropping was often more productive than

harvests in Europe and Asia.

Many cattle breeds provided draft power, both for

field work and for transportation. They also supplied

milk, but they were too valuable to be slaughtered for

meat unless they got very old. Horses were used exten-

sively in war from antiquity—but they became superior

draft animals only with the adoption of an eYcient harness

and iron horseshoes, and their widespread use in tradi-

tional agriculture came only when changes in cropping

patterns provided enough concentrate feed.

Virtually all fuel in preindustrial societies came from

wood, charcoal, and straw. For household cooking and

heating, these fuels were burned ineYciently in a variety

of fireplaces; enclosed stoves with chimneys are a surpris-

ingly late innovation. Because of its high energy density,

charcoal was the preferred fuel for smelting and pro-

cessing metals, mainly copper, iron, and steel, and for fir-

ing bricks.

Our ancestors spent more than nine-tenths of their exis-

tence as hunters and gatherers in activities that required

many physical and mental adaptations and were also indis-

pensable for the emergence of social complexity. But only

in some coastal communities, tapping rich seasonal migra-

tions of ocean fish and mammals, could foraging support

high population densities and lead to a sedentary exis-

tence. On grasslands and in forests population densities of

roaming foragers were hardly higher than those of their

primate ancestors.

As their numbers rose, most foragers had to turn to

an increasingly sedentary way of cropping. These agricul-

tural practices began with shifting cultivation. In this

least energy-intensive mode of crop production the culti-

vation of several crops of tubers, grains, or fruits on a

patch of land cleared of natural vegetation (usually by fire)

alternated with often long periods of fallow.

A further rise in population densities brought a vari-

ety of traditional agricultures. Throughout the Old

World human groups shared domestication of animals, re-

liance on plowing, and the cultivation of staple cereal and

PREINDUSTRIAL SOCIETIES

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

Most preindustrial labor was done by muscular exer-

tions of people and animals. More powerful sources of

kinetic energy—waterwheels and windmills—were in-

vented only after millennia of settled societies, and in most

such societies they made only marginal contributions. The

capacities of these mechanical prime movers, used for

many food processing and manufacturing tasks and also in

raising water, grew only slowly.

Improvements in the typical performance of sailships

were also very slow. Fundamental breakthrough came only

at the beginning of the early modern era. At that time the

combination of more maneuverable vessels with more ac-

curate guns (made possible by advances in the smelting

of copper and iron and by the invention of gunpowder)

produced an energy converter of unprecedented speed,

range, and destructive power that helped to usher a new

era of world history.

Hunters and Gatherers
Only an uninformed view would not perceive tens of

thousands of years of hominid foraging as a prolonged

prelude to a truly sapient existence in increasingly complex

civilizations. To continue the musical analogy, it was very

much like acquiring a large ensemble of specialized instru-

ments, fine-tuning them, and getting them ready to play

ever more intricate scores. Development of all of the key

characteristics distinguishing humans from other pri-

mates—bipedality, manual dexterity, elaborate tool mak-

ing, intergenerational transfer of technical skills, and

higher encephalization—was fostered by our evolution

from simple foragers to sophisticated hunters and incipi-

ent plant cultivators.

The earliest foragers were almost certainly opportu-

nistic scavengers, taking advantage of partially eaten herbi-

vore carcasses left behind by large predators—or at least

breaking the bones to extract the nutritious marrow. They

were obviously omnivorous, collecting and killing scores

of diVerent edibles, but a small number of foods was usu-

ally dominant. Large roots—easily found by associated

leaves or stalks and dug out quickly with the help of

pointed sticks—provided the highest (up to fortyfold) net

energy returns in gathering. But unlike grains, which

were also easy to collect and had higher energy content,

they were low in protein. High returns in collecting large

seeds and nuts were reduced by often considerable energy

expenditures in their processing.

Typical gathering of a wide variety of plant foods re-

turned at least ten to fifteen times the invested energy, ra-

tios similar to killing large mammals—while hunting

smaller animals yielded much smaller energy returns. For-

aging was especially unrewarding in tropical forests where

edible fruits and seeds are a very small share of total plant

mass and are mostly inaccessible in high canopies. And

because most tropical mammalian herbivores are arbo-

real, their hunting also yielded low energy returns. This

explains why there is no unambiguous ethnographic ac-

counts of tropical foragers who would not engage in some

plant cultivation.

In contrast, grasslands provided excellent foraging

environment. Grass seeds and starchy roots were easy to

collect, and there were many large herbivores. Cooperative

hunting of large ungulates—much more rewarding than

solitary pursuits—clearly made lasting contributions to

106

CHAPTER 4

Comparison of the oldest Oldowan tools with larger
Acheulean hand axes used to butcher animals.

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

two thousand-fold net energy return, perhaps the highest

documented foraging gain. Much lower, but still very

comfortable, ratios were obtained by killing seals or catch-

ing migrating salmon. Seasonal abundance of such foods

could be also easily preserved by drying or smoking and

stored for later use. Large-scale food storage helped to sta-

bilize populations at higher densities: maritime foragers

could cease roaming and could live in fairly large, perma-

nent settlements with social stratification, elaborate ritu-

als, and long-distance trade.

Except for some maritime cultures, foraging societies

could not attain population densities needed for func-

tional and social diversification. The least hospitable envi-

ronments (tundras, boreal forests) supported population

densities of just 1 person/km2, while the most suitable

habitats (tropical and temperate grasslands) could carry

from ten to a hundred times more people. Because of

diVerences in phytomass storage, accessibility and edibility

of plant parts, and sizes and habits of hunted animals these

large density variations had no simple correlations with

total photosynthesis or biodiversity of habitats.

human socialization. Many large mammals could be killed

by skilfully driving them into confined runs and capturing

them in pens or natural traps, or by stampeding them

over cliVs.

But simple energy ratios favoring the killing of bison

over the snaring of hares does not capture the desired

quality of hunted food. Foraging diets were often low in

lipids, and inland hunters could satisfy the apparently uni-

versal craving to eat filling fat, rather than just lean meat,

only by killing larger fatty mammals. This is why the Afri-

can hunters, exploiting the unique human capacity for

long-distance running, were willing to chase big ante-

lopes to exhaustion; this is why their counterparts in bo-

real Europe were willing to face huge woolly mammoth

with their simple spears; or why North American Indians

invested so much eVort into driving bisons across preci-

pices: energy return on their labor investment was eating

food uncommonly filling with lipids.

Maritime hunters could get similar rewards with usu-

ally much less exertion. Killing of migrating baleen whales

by the Northwestern Alaskan Inuit provided more than a

107

PREINDUSTRIAL SOCIETIES

G/wi
boreal or subarctic

foraging environments

arid
tropical

Punan

Aranda

Dorobo

Cheyenne

huntingfishing

gathering

Dobe

Cree

Chenchu

Siriono

SemangPaiute

Andaman

Crow

Vedda

Ona

Montagnais
Mbuti

AetaKwakiutl
Klamath

Nootka
Makah

Aleut

Twana Micmac
Nunamiut

Approximate contributions of gathering, hunting,
and fishing to typical diets of some foraging societies

surviving into the twentieth century.

Population density (people/km2)

Nunamiut

Aeta

Netsilik
Dobe

Cree
Punan

Siriono
G/wi

Mbuti

Vedda
Kwakiutl

Nootka
Makah

Di
st

an
ce

t
ra

ve
lle

d
(k

m
/y

ea
r)

10 3

10 2

10 1

10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0

Relationship between population density and annual travel in
foraging societies: Maritime cultures could be least mobile.

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

Although some foraging societies had to spend just a

few hours a day to enjoy abundant food supply, other had

to cope with recurrent hardships intensified by seasonal

food shortages leading to high infant mortalities (and to

infanticide) and to often devastating famines. The idea of

foraging existence as the original aZuent society is clearly

an impermissible generalization.

Overall energy returns of crop cultivation were com-

monly lower than those for many kinds of foraging, and

that is why hunters and gatherers coexisted with settled

agricultural societies for hundreds, and sometimes even

for thousands, of years. But even extensive cultivation

could support higher population densities and assure a

more reliable food supply than that enjoyed by most

foraging societies. The fastest transition to permanent

cropping happened on fertile floodplains, but elsewhere

agriculture began, and continued for often very long

periods, as shifting cultivation.

This practice extended from rainy tropics to the sub-

arctic forests, and it encompassed a wide variety of species

108

CHAPTER 4

Burning of forest phytomass, the first
step in creating temporary fields.

modern farming

traditional farming

shifting farming

pastoralism

foraging
Po

pu
la

ti
on

d
en

si
ty

(p
eo

pl
e/

km
2 )

10 3

10 2

10 1

10 0

10-1

10 -2

Shifting cultivation could support population densities two
orders of magnitude higher than foraging—but an order of

magnitude lower than traditional farming.

Shifting Cultivation
Adoption of plant cultivation, and in most cultures also of

associated domestication of animals, was a multifocal and

gradual process stimulated by population growth beyond

the densities supportable by foraging and by environmen-

tal changes (such as a drier climate or elimination of pre-

viously abundant prey) reducing food supply that hunters

and gatherers could get by foraging. Diminishing energy

returns in foraging favored more regular reliance on incip-

ient cultivation begun with the deliberate planting of tu-

bers or scattering of seeds that was practiced by many

gatherers.Domestication of wild grains and cattle oVered

a supply of high-quality nutrients.

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

ping. Net energy returns for grains, be they tropical

(dryland Asian rices), subtropical (African millets), or tem-

perate (European rye) ranged mostly between ten and fif-

teen. Less labor was needed for corn (its energy returns

were commonly more than twentyfold) and for tropical

tubers, legumes, and bananas (the best energy returns

ranged between forty and seventy). Ancient Mesoamerica,

with staples of corn, beans, and squash, achieved some of

the highest food production eYciencies, but even less

eYcient shifting cultivation could support population

densities ten times higher than those of prosperous hunt-

ers and gatherers. Minima were about 0.2 people per

hectare in Eastern North America (corn gardening), max-

ima surpassed 0.6 people per hectare in Southeast Asia

(upland rice and roots). High energy returns sustained

shifting cultivation in parts of Asia, Africa, and Latin

America into the twentieth century. Higher population

densities and shorter regeneration cycles have been the

main reasons for its recent decline.

Traditional Agricultures
DiVerences in climate, soils, crops and in specific farming

practices created a great variety of traditional agricul-

tures—but physical imperatives of field cultivation dic-

tated a recurrent pattern of labor. Throughout the Old

World the sequence begun with plowing and harrowing

which prepared loosened, weed-free, well-aerated, and

leveled soil ready for sowing (mostly by hand). Plow de-

signs progressed from the simplest symmetrical scratch

plows, which created merely a shallow furrow for seeds,

to asymmetrical moldboard plows—first just straight

pieces of wood, later with curved metal plowshares—

which turned soil over, buried the cut weeds, and elimi-

nated the need for crossplowing. Harvesting was done,

slowly, by sickles, later by more eYcient scythes (the first

successful mechanical reapers were introduced only after

1830).

and local peculiarities. But everywhere it alternated be-

tween short periods of cropping (commonly just one sea-

son, rarely more than three years) and long spans of fallow

(sometimes up to twenty-five to thirty years, more com-

monly at least a decade). The cropping cycle began with

often only partial removal of natural phytomass. In forests

and shrublands this was done by a combination of felling,

slashing, and burning; in grasslands just by setting fires.

Nearly all nitrogen was lost in combustion, but mineral

nutrients helped to produce at least one or two fairly

good crops.

Cultivated species included cereal and leguminous

grains, tubers (sweet potatoes, cassava, yams), vegetables,

fruits, fibers, and medicinal plants. Few staples provided

most of the food nutrients, but the total number of

planted species was rarely less than a dozen, and in warmer

environments it often surpassed two scores. Cultivation

was done commonly in jumbled, gardenlike arrange-

ments, with high degrees of interplanting and intercrop-

109

PREINDUSTRIAL SOCIETIES

Roots have been dominant staples in tropical shifting cultivation.

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

July 1, 2023

leguminous grains. None of the New World’s complex

societies—Incas, Mayas, or Aztecs—acquired the first two

traits, but their cropping was often more productive than

harvests in Europe and Asia.

Many cattle breeds provided draft power, both for

field work and for transportation. They also supplied

milk, but they were too valuable to be slaughtered for

meat unless they got very old. Horses were used exten-

sively in war from antiquity—but they became superior

draft animals only with the adoption of an eYcient harness

and iron horseshoes, and their widespread use in tradi-

tional agriculture came only when changes in cropping

patterns provided enough concentrate feed.

Virtually all fuel in preindustrial societies came from

wood, charcoal, and straw. For household cooking and

heating, these fuels were burned ineYciently in a variety

of fireplaces; enclosed stoves with chimneys are a surpris-

ingly late innovation. Because of its high energy density,

charcoal was the preferred fuel for smelting and pro-

cessing metals, mainly copper, iron, and steel, and for fir-

ing bricks.

Our ancestors spent more than nine-tenths of their exis-

tence as hunters and gatherers in activities that required

many physical and mental adaptations and were also indis-

pensable for the emergence of social complexity. But only

in some coastal communities, tapping rich seasonal migra-

tions of ocean fish and mammals, could foraging support

high population densities and lead to a sedentary exis-

tence. On grasslands and in forests population densities of

roaming foragers were hardly higher than those of their

primate ancestors.

As their numbers rose, most foragers had to turn to

an increasingly sedentary way of cropping. These agricul-

tural practices began with shifting cultivation. In this

least energy-intensive mode of crop production the culti-

vation of several crops of tubers, grains, or fruits on a

patch of land cleared of natural vegetation (usually by fire)

alternated with often long periods of fallow.

A further rise in population densities brought a vari-

ety of traditional agricultures. Throughout the Old

World human groups shared domestication of animals, re-

liance on plowing, and the cultivation of staple cereal and

PREINDUSTRIAL SOCIETIES

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

Most preindustrial labor was done by muscular exer-

tions of people and animals. More powerful sources of

kinetic energy—waterwheels and windmills—were in-

vented only after millennia of settled societies, and in most

such societies they made only marginal contributions. The

capacities of these mechanical prime movers, used for

many food processing and manufacturing tasks and also in

raising water, grew only slowly.

Improvements in the typical performance of sailships

were also very slow. Fundamental breakthrough came only

at the beginning of the early modern era. At that time the

combination of more maneuverable vessels with more ac-

curate guns (made possible by advances in the smelting

of copper and iron and by the invention of gunpowder)

produced an energy converter of unprecedented speed,

range, and destructive power that helped to usher a new

era of world history.

Hunters and Gatherers
Only an uninformed view would not perceive tens of

thousands of years of hominid foraging as a prolonged

prelude to a truly sapient existence in increasingly complex

civilizations. To continue the musical analogy, it was very

much like acquiring a large ensemble of specialized instru-

ments, fine-tuning them, and getting them ready to play

ever more intricate scores. Development of all of the key

characteristics distinguishing humans from other pri-

mates—bipedality, manual dexterity, elaborate tool mak-

ing, intergenerational transfer of technical skills, and

higher encephalization—was fostered by our evolution

from simple foragers to sophisticated hunters and incipi-

ent plant cultivators.

The earliest foragers were almost certainly opportu-

nistic scavengers, taking advantage of partially eaten herbi-

vore carcasses left behind by large predators—or at least

breaking the bones to extract the nutritious marrow. They

were obviously omnivorous, collecting and killing scores

of diVerent edibles, but a small number of foods was usu-

ally dominant. Large roots—easily found by associated

leaves or stalks and dug out quickly with the help of

pointed sticks—provided the highest (up to fortyfold) net

energy returns in gathering. But unlike grains, which

were also easy to collect and had higher energy content,

they were low in protein. High returns in collecting large

seeds and nuts were reduced by often considerable energy

expenditures in their processing.

Typical gathering of a wide variety of plant foods re-

turned at least ten to fifteen times the invested energy, ra-

tios similar to killing large mammals—while hunting

smaller animals yielded much smaller energy returns. For-

aging was especially unrewarding in tropical forests where

edible fruits and seeds are a very small share of total plant

mass and are mostly inaccessible in high canopies. And

because most tropical mammalian herbivores are arbo-

real, their hunting also yielded low energy returns. This

explains why there is no unambiguous ethnographic ac-

counts of tropical foragers who would not engage in some

plant cultivation.

In contrast, grasslands provided excellent foraging

environment. Grass seeds and starchy roots were easy to

collect, and there were many large herbivores. Cooperative

hunting of large ungulates—much more rewarding than

solitary pursuits—clearly made lasting contributions to

106

CHAPTER 4

Comparison of the oldest Oldowan tools with larger
Acheulean hand axes used to butcher animals.

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

two thousand-fold net energy return, perhaps the highest

documented foraging gain. Much lower, but still very

comfortable, ratios were obtained by killing seals or catch-

ing migrating salmon. Seasonal abundance of such foods

could be also easily preserved by drying or smoking and

stored for later use. Large-scale food storage helped to sta-

bilize populations at higher densities: maritime foragers

could cease roaming and could live in fairly large, perma-

nent settlements with social stratification, elaborate ritu-

als, and long-distance trade.

Except for some maritime cultures, foraging societies

could not attain population densities needed for func-

tional and social diversification. The least hospitable envi-

ronments (tundras, boreal forests) supported population

densities of just 1 person/km2, while the most suitable

habitats (tropical and temperate grasslands) could carry

from ten to a hundred times more people. Because of

diVerences in phytomass storage, accessibility and edibility

of plant parts, and sizes and habits of hunted animals these

large density variations had no simple correlations with

total photosynthesis or biodiversity of habitats.

human socialization. Many large mammals could be killed

by skilfully driving them into confined runs and capturing

them in pens or natural traps, or by stampeding them

over cliVs.

But simple energy ratios favoring the killing of bison

over the snaring of hares does not capture the desired

quality of hunted food. Foraging diets were often low in

lipids, and inland hunters could satisfy the apparently uni-

versal craving to eat filling fat, rather than just lean meat,

only by killing larger fatty mammals. This is why the Afri-

can hunters, exploiting the unique human capacity for

long-distance running, were willing to chase big ante-

lopes to exhaustion; this is why their counterparts in bo-

real Europe were willing to face huge woolly mammoth

with their simple spears; or why North American Indians

invested so much eVort into driving bisons across preci-

pices: energy return on their labor investment was eating

food uncommonly filling with lipids.

Maritime hunters could get similar rewards with usu-

ally much less exertion. Killing of migrating baleen whales

by the Northwestern Alaskan Inuit provided more than a

107

PREINDUSTRIAL SOCIETIES

G/wi
boreal or subarctic

foraging environments

arid
tropical

Punan

Aranda

Dorobo

Cheyenne

huntingfishing

gathering

Dobe

Cree

Chenchu

Siriono

SemangPaiute

Andaman

Crow

Vedda

Ona

Montagnais
Mbuti

AetaKwakiutl
Klamath

Nootka
Makah

Aleut

Twana Micmac
Nunamiut

Approximate contributions of gathering, hunting,
and fishing to typical diets of some foraging societies

surviving into the twentieth century.

Population density (people/km2)

Nunamiut

Aeta

Netsilik
Dobe

Cree
Punan

Siriono
G/wi

Mbuti

Vedda
Kwakiutl

Nootka
Makah

Di
st

an
ce

t
ra

ve
lle

d
(k

m
/y

ea
r)

10 3

10 2

10 1

10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0

Relationship between population density and annual travel in
foraging societies: Maritime cultures could be least mobile.

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

Although some foraging societies had to spend just a

few hours a day to enjoy abundant food supply, other had

to cope with recurrent hardships intensified by seasonal

food shortages leading to high infant mortalities (and to

infanticide) and to often devastating famines. The idea of

foraging existence as the original aZuent society is clearly

an impermissible generalization.

Overall energy returns of crop cultivation were com-

monly lower than those for many kinds of foraging, and

that is why hunters and gatherers coexisted with settled

agricultural societies for hundreds, and sometimes even

for thousands, of years. But even extensive cultivation

could support higher population densities and assure a

more reliable food supply than that enjoyed by most

foraging societies. The fastest transition to permanent

cropping happened on fertile floodplains, but elsewhere

agriculture began, and continued for often very long

periods, as shifting cultivation.

This practice extended from rainy tropics to the sub-

arctic forests, and it encompassed a wide variety of species

108

CHAPTER 4

Burning of forest phytomass, the first
step in creating temporary fields.

modern farming

traditional farming

shifting farming

pastoralism

foraging
Po

pu
la

ti
on

d
en

si
ty

(p
eo

pl
e/

km
2 )

10 3

10 2

10 1

10 0

10-1

10 -2

Shifting cultivation could support population densities two
orders of magnitude higher than foraging—but an order of

magnitude lower than traditional farming.

Shifting Cultivation
Adoption of plant cultivation, and in most cultures also of

associated domestication of animals, was a multifocal and

gradual process stimulated by population growth beyond

the densities supportable by foraging and by environmen-

tal changes (such as a drier climate or elimination of pre-

viously abundant prey) reducing food supply that hunters

and gatherers could get by foraging. Diminishing energy

returns in foraging favored more regular reliance on incip-

ient cultivation begun with the deliberate planting of tu-

bers or scattering of seeds that was practiced by many

gatherers.Domestication of wild grains and cattle oVered

a supply of high-quality nutrients.

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

ping. Net energy returns for grains, be they tropical

(dryland Asian rices), subtropical (African millets), or tem-

perate (European rye) ranged mostly between ten and fif-

teen. Less labor was needed for corn (its energy returns

were commonly more than twentyfold) and for tropical

tubers, legumes, and bananas (the best energy returns

ranged between forty and seventy). Ancient Mesoamerica,

with staples of corn, beans, and squash, achieved some of

the highest food production eYciencies, but even less

eYcient shifting cultivation could support population

densities ten times higher than those of prosperous hunt-

ers and gatherers. Minima were about 0.2 people per

hectare in Eastern North America (corn gardening), max-

ima surpassed 0.6 people per hectare in Southeast Asia

(upland rice and roots). High energy returns sustained

shifting cultivation in parts of Asia, Africa, and Latin

America into the twentieth century. Higher population

densities and shorter regeneration cycles have been the

main reasons for its recent decline.

Traditional Agricultures
DiVerences in climate, soils, crops and in specific farming

practices created a great variety of traditional agricul-

tures—but physical imperatives of field cultivation dic-

tated a recurrent pattern of labor. Throughout the Old

World the sequence begun with plowing and harrowing

which prepared loosened, weed-free, well-aerated, and

leveled soil ready for sowing (mostly by hand). Plow de-

signs progressed from the simplest symmetrical scratch

plows, which created merely a shallow furrow for seeds,

to asymmetrical moldboard plows—first just straight

pieces of wood, later with curved metal plowshares—

which turned soil over, buried the cut weeds, and elimi-

nated the need for crossplowing. Harvesting was done,

slowly, by sickles, later by more eYcient scythes (the first

successful mechanical reapers were introduced only after

1830).

and local peculiarities. But everywhere it alternated be-

tween short periods of cropping (commonly just one sea-

son, rarely more than three years) and long spans of fallow

(sometimes up to twenty-five to thirty years, more com-

monly at least a decade). The cropping cycle began with

often only partial removal of natural phytomass. In forests

and shrublands this was done by a combination of felling,

slashing, and burning; in grasslands just by setting fires.

Nearly all nitrogen was lost in combustion, but mineral

nutrients helped to produce at least one or two fairly

good crops.

Cultivated species included cereal and leguminous

grains, tubers (sweet potatoes, cassava, yams), vegetables,

fruits, fibers, and medicinal plants. Few staples provided

most of the food nutrients, but the total number of

planted species was rarely less than a dozen, and in warmer

environments it often surpassed two scores. Cultivation

was done commonly in jumbled, gardenlike arrange-

ments, with high degrees of interplanting and intercrop-

109

PREINDUSTRIAL SOCIETIES

Roots have been dominant staples in tropical shifting cultivation.

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

July 1, 2023

leguminous grains. None of the New World’s complex

societies—Incas, Mayas, or Aztecs—acquired the first two

traits, but their cropping was often more productive than

harvests in Europe and Asia.

Many cattle breeds provided draft power, both for

field work and for transportation. They also supplied

milk, but they were too valuable to be slaughtered for

meat unless they got very old. Horses were used exten-

sively in war from antiquity—but they became superior

draft animals only with the adoption of an eYcient harness

and iron horseshoes, and their widespread use in tradi-

tional agriculture came only when changes in cropping

patterns provided enough concentrate feed.

Virtually all fuel in preindustrial societies came from

wood, charcoal, and straw. For household cooking and

heating, these fuels were burned ineYciently in a variety

of fireplaces; enclosed stoves with chimneys are a surpris-

ingly late innovation. Because of its high energy density,

charcoal was the preferred fuel for smelting and pro-

cessing metals, mainly copper, iron, and steel, and for fir-

ing bricks.

Our ancestors spent more than nine-tenths of their exis-

tence as hunters and gatherers in activities that required

many physical and mental adaptations and were also indis-

pensable for the emergence of social complexity. But only

in some coastal communities, tapping rich seasonal migra-

tions of ocean fish and mammals, could foraging support

high population densities and lead to a sedentary exis-

tence. On grasslands and in forests population densities of

roaming foragers were hardly higher than those of their

primate ancestors.

As their numbers rose, most foragers had to turn to

an increasingly sedentary way of cropping. These agricul-

tural practices began with shifting cultivation. In this

least energy-intensive mode of crop production the culti-

vation of several crops of tubers, grains, or fruits on a

patch of land cleared of natural vegetation (usually by fire)

alternated with often long periods of fallow.

A further rise in population densities brought a vari-

ety of traditional agricultures. Throughout the Old

World human groups shared domestication of animals, re-

liance on plowing, and the cultivation of staple cereal and

PREINDUSTRIAL SOCIETIES

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

Most preindustrial labor was done by muscular exer-

tions of people and animals. More powerful sources of

kinetic energy—waterwheels and windmills—were in-

vented only after millennia of settled societies, and in most

such societies they made only marginal contributions. The

capacities of these mechanical prime movers, used for

many food processing and manufacturing tasks and also in

raising water, grew only slowly.

Improvements in the typical performance of sailships

were also very slow. Fundamental breakthrough came only

at the beginning of the early modern era. At that time the

combination of more maneuverable vessels with more ac-

curate guns (made possible by advances in the smelting

of copper and iron and by the invention of gunpowder)

produced an energy converter of unprecedented speed,

range, and destructive power that helped to usher a new

era of world history.

Hunters and Gatherers
Only an uninformed view would not perceive tens of

thousands of years of hominid foraging as a prolonged

prelude to a truly sapient existence in increasingly complex

civilizations. To continue the musical analogy, it was very

much like acquiring a large ensemble of specialized instru-

ments, fine-tuning them, and getting them ready to play

ever more intricate scores. Development of all of the key

characteristics distinguishing humans from other pri-

mates—bipedality, manual dexterity, elaborate tool mak-

ing, intergenerational transfer of technical skills, and

higher encephalization—was fostered by our evolution

from simple foragers to sophisticated hunters and incipi-

ent plant cultivators.

The earliest foragers were almost certainly opportu-

nistic scavengers, taking advantage of partially eaten herbi-

vore carcasses left behind by large predators—or at least

breaking the bones to extract the nutritious marrow. They

were obviously omnivorous, collecting and killing scores

of diVerent edibles, but a small number of foods was usu-

ally dominant. Large roots—easily found by associated

leaves or stalks and dug out quickly with the help of

pointed sticks—provided the highest (up to fortyfold) net

energy returns in gathering. But unlike grains, which

were also easy to collect and had higher energy content,

they were low in protein. High returns in collecting large

seeds and nuts were reduced by often considerable energy

expenditures in their processing.

Typical gathering of a wide variety of plant foods re-

turned at least ten to fifteen times the invested energy, ra-

tios similar to killing large mammals—while hunting

smaller animals yielded much smaller energy returns. For-

aging was especially unrewarding in tropical forests where

edible fruits and seeds are a very small share of total plant

mass and are mostly inaccessible in high canopies. And

because most tropical mammalian herbivores are arbo-

real, their hunting also yielded low energy returns. This

explains why there is no unambiguous ethnographic ac-

counts of tropical foragers who would not engage in some

plant cultivation.

In contrast, grasslands provided excellent foraging

environment. Grass seeds and starchy roots were easy to

collect, and there were many large herbivores. Cooperative

hunting of large ungulates—much more rewarding than

solitary pursuits—clearly made lasting contributions to

106

CHAPTER 4

Comparison of the oldest Oldowan tools with larger
Acheulean hand axes used to butcher animals.

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

two thousand-fold net energy return, perhaps the highest

documented foraging gain. Much lower, but still very

comfortable, ratios were obtained by killing seals or catch-

ing migrating salmon. Seasonal abundance of such foods

could be also easily preserved by drying or smoking and

stored for later use. Large-scale food storage helped to sta-

bilize populations at higher densities: maritime foragers

could cease roaming and could live in fairly large, perma-

nent settlements with social stratification, elaborate ritu-

als, and long-distance trade.

Except for some maritime cultures, foraging societies

could not attain population densities needed for func-

tional and social diversification. The least hospitable envi-

ronments (tundras, boreal forests) supported population

densities of just 1 person/km2, while the most suitable

habitats (tropical and temperate grasslands) could carry

from ten to a hundred times more people. Because of

diVerences in phytomass storage, accessibility and edibility

of plant parts, and sizes and habits of hunted animals these

large density variations had no simple correlations with

total photosynthesis or biodiversity of habitats.

human socialization. Many large mammals could be killed

by skilfully driving them into confined runs and capturing

them in pens or natural traps, or by stampeding them

over cliVs.

But simple energy ratios favoring the killing of bison

over the snaring of hares does not capture the desired

quality of hunted food. Foraging diets were often low in

lipids, and inland hunters could satisfy the apparently uni-

versal craving to eat filling fat, rather than just lean meat,

only by killing larger fatty mammals. This is why the Afri-

can hunters, exploiting the unique human capacity for

long-distance running, were willing to chase big ante-

lopes to exhaustion; this is why their counterparts in bo-

real Europe were willing to face huge woolly mammoth

with their simple spears; or why North American Indians

invested so much eVort into driving bisons across preci-

pices: energy return on their labor investment was eating

food uncommonly filling with lipids.

Maritime hunters could get similar rewards with usu-

ally much less exertion. Killing of migrating baleen whales

by the Northwestern Alaskan Inuit provided more than a

107

PREINDUSTRIAL SOCIETIES

G/wi
boreal or subarctic

foraging environments

arid
tropical

Punan

Aranda

Dorobo

Cheyenne

huntingfishing

gathering

Dobe

Cree

Chenchu

Siriono

SemangPaiute

Andaman

Crow

Vedda

Ona

Montagnais
Mbuti

AetaKwakiutl
Klamath

Nootka
Makah

Aleut

Twana Micmac
Nunamiut

Approximate contributions of gathering, hunting,
and fishing to typical diets of some foraging societies

surviving into the twentieth century.

Population density (people/km2)

Nunamiut

Aeta

Netsilik
Dobe

Cree
Punan

Siriono
G/wi

Mbuti

Vedda
Kwakiutl

Nootka
Makah

Di
st

an
ce

t
ra

ve
lle

d
(k

m
/y

ea
r)

10 3

10 2

10 1

10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0

Relationship between population density and annual travel in
foraging societies: Maritime cultures could be least mobile.

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

Although some foraging societies had to spend just a

few hours a day to enjoy abundant food supply, other had

to cope with recurrent hardships intensified by seasonal

food shortages leading to high infant mortalities (and to

infanticide) and to often devastating famines. The idea of

foraging existence as the original aZuent society is clearly

an impermissible generalization.

Overall energy returns of crop cultivation were com-

monly lower than those for many kinds of foraging, and

that is why hunters and gatherers coexisted with settled

agricultural societies for hundreds, and sometimes even

for thousands, of years. But even extensive cultivation

could support higher population densities and assure a

more reliable food supply than that enjoyed by most

foraging societies. The fastest transition to permanent

cropping happened on fertile floodplains, but elsewhere

agriculture began, and continued for often very long

periods, as shifting cultivation.

This practice extended from rainy tropics to the sub-

arctic forests, and it encompassed a wide variety of species

108

CHAPTER 4

Burning of forest phytomass, the first
step in creating temporary fields.

modern farming

traditional farming

shifting farming

pastoralism

foraging
Po

pu
la

ti
on

d
en

si
ty

(p
eo

pl
e/

km
2 )

10 3

10 2

10 1

10 0

10-1

10 -2

Shifting cultivation could support population densities two
orders of magnitude higher than foraging—but an order of

magnitude lower than traditional farming.

Shifting Cultivation
Adoption of plant cultivation, and in most cultures also of

associated domestication of animals, was a multifocal and

gradual process stimulated by population growth beyond

the densities supportable by foraging and by environmen-

tal changes (such as a drier climate or elimination of pre-

viously abundant prey) reducing food supply that hunters

and gatherers could get by foraging. Diminishing energy

returns in foraging favored more regular reliance on incip-

ient cultivation begun with the deliberate planting of tu-

bers or scattering of seeds that was practiced by many

gatherers.Domestication of wild grains and cattle oVered

a supply of high-quality nutrients.

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

ping. Net energy returns for grains, be they tropical

(dryland Asian rices), subtropical (African millets), or tem-

perate (European rye) ranged mostly between ten and fif-

teen. Less labor was needed for corn (its energy returns

were commonly more than twentyfold) and for tropical

tubers, legumes, and bananas (the best energy returns

ranged between forty and seventy). Ancient Mesoamerica,

with staples of corn, beans, and squash, achieved some of

the highest food production eYciencies, but even less

eYcient shifting cultivation could support population

densities ten times higher than those of prosperous hunt-

ers and gatherers. Minima were about 0.2 people per

hectare in Eastern North America (corn gardening), max-

ima surpassed 0.6 people per hectare in Southeast Asia

(upland rice and roots). High energy returns sustained

shifting cultivation in parts of Asia, Africa, and Latin

America into the twentieth century. Higher population

densities and shorter regeneration cycles have been the

main reasons for its recent decline.

Traditional Agricultures
DiVerences in climate, soils, crops and in specific farming

practices created a great variety of traditional agricul-

tures—but physical imperatives of field cultivation dic-

tated a recurrent pattern of labor. Throughout the Old

World the sequence begun with plowing and harrowing

which prepared loosened, weed-free, well-aerated, and

leveled soil ready for sowing (mostly by hand). Plow de-

signs progressed from the simplest symmetrical scratch

plows, which created merely a shallow furrow for seeds,

to asymmetrical moldboard plows—first just straight

pieces of wood, later with curved metal plowshares—

which turned soil over, buried the cut weeds, and elimi-

nated the need for crossplowing. Harvesting was done,

slowly, by sickles, later by more eYcient scythes (the first

successful mechanical reapers were introduced only after

1830).

and local peculiarities. But everywhere it alternated be-

tween short periods of cropping (commonly just one sea-

son, rarely more than three years) and long spans of fallow

(sometimes up to twenty-five to thirty years, more com-

monly at least a decade). The cropping cycle began with

often only partial removal of natural phytomass. In forests

and shrublands this was done by a combination of felling,

slashing, and burning; in grasslands just by setting fires.

Nearly all nitrogen was lost in combustion, but mineral

nutrients helped to produce at least one or two fairly

good crops.

Cultivated species included cereal and leguminous

grains, tubers (sweet potatoes, cassava, yams), vegetables,

fruits, fibers, and medicinal plants. Few staples provided

most of the food nutrients, but the total number of

planted species was rarely less than a dozen, and in warmer

environments it often surpassed two scores. Cultivation

was done commonly in jumbled, gardenlike arrange-

ments, with high degrees of interplanting and intercrop-

109

PREINDUSTRIAL SOCIETIES

Roots have been dominant staples in tropical shifting cultivation.

Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/189688/9780262283830_cad.pdf by University of Washington user on 20 September 2023

Essay (any type)

August 22, 2022

They have a magnificent team. These people are always kind and willing to listen to your concerns or issues. Better yet, your assignment is always ready before the time, they usually send you a draft to double-check before they finalize your paper.

Case study

August 22, 2022

Completed quickly and followed instructions given. Grammar, spelling, etc. was all good as well. Thank you so much! Will hire in the future.

Presentation/PPT

August 22, 2022

The work has not been graded but I like the output that was submitted to me. Is it possible for the same prof to do the next assignment I will be submitting? If possible, I will greatly appreciate it.

Journal article

August 22, 2022

My third using this writer and absolutely amazing work! Very punctual and very understanding.

Article

August 22, 2022

Outstanding job in writing my paper. I am always thrill to receive a well written paper that follows the instructions and the thorough details put into my paper. The quality of this paper is beyond awesome. Thank you so much.

Thesis/Thesis chapter

August 22, 2022

I absolutely love this writer! He/she always cranks out a fabulous paper and follows the assignment guidelines/instructions perfectly. Thanks again for always providing such quality work!!!

Research paper

August 22, 2022

It took some time to achieve the product I was looking for, but we eventually got there. I do feel like a lot of hard work was put into this, and it even exceeded the page requirement. I'm pretty pleased overall. I give my thanks.

Lab Report

August 22, 2022

Outstanding work! This writer followed every instruction and my paper came back with an A! I recommend to anyone needing help! Thank you again ❤️

Outline

August 22, 2022

Essay (any type)

August 22, 2022

Made 100% on both the outline and the paper. Quick turnaround time and my writer responded within 30 min or less. Any edits my instructor needed, my writer was patient and worked diligently to accomplish the task. Would recommend my writer to anyone!

Essay (any type)

August 5, 2021

You are making my life so much easier! I am a single mom that works and goes to school. You guys are helping me with my projects so I can have more free time with my son.

Annotated Bibliography

August 5, 2021

I was sure it can fit in a single page but the next time I will add one more page because I am impressed with your professionalism and quality. Will use many more times till I graduate.

Essay (any type)

August 5, 2021

Simple registration and quality services. I just ordered one paper, and it was good enough to pass the exam. That is what I need the most. Good job.

Research Proposal

August 5, 2021

I couldn’t finish my freaking essay, and I was very desperate. A friend of mine sent me a link, and that is how I found out about you guys. Thank you for professional tips and editing. Now, I understand how to write it properly.

Reflection

August 5, 2021

I’m so grateful to you since you managed to complete my term paper in one day! You are definitely the best company ever!

Essay (any type)

August 5, 2021

I am sure on your ability to provide any type of paper I will order. I wish I could develop that skill your writers have to be able to have a flow of ideas and excellent sequencing of thoughts in writing.

Coursework

August 5, 2021

I ordered a thesis paper and was satisfied. All the guys were polite and highly professional, even when I wrote to them several times per day. Thanks for your passion!

Discussion Essay

August 5, 2021

I turned to the service twice, and my papers always were beyond the expectations. To tell the truth, I was ready to find some grammar errors or something like that. However, everything was neat and tidy.

August 5, 2021

My friend recommended Doctor My Essay to me. It is convenient! Now we both turn to the service periodically coz wanna save some time and use it more effectively. I know that while I’m developing my startup, an expert is working on paper. Time management in work!

Research Paper

August 5, 2021

I write all paper works by myself but have some problems with literacy. Actually, I have enormous problems because English is not my native language. However, with proofreading from Doctor My Essay, I can relax and don’t be ashamed of mistakes.

Argumentative Essay

August 5, 2021

Your ability to write concisely is a finding. The paper has a solid argument. It’s clear that the writer understood central claim about the topic. He also presented original ideas to consider.

Coursework

August 5, 2021

That paper got the highest grade in my class and the professor thinks I’m the smartest student. Lol.

Essay (any type)

August 5, 2021

I was convinced that paper writing services are the fiction for naive students. But when it came to my research paper that was to be composed in 72 hours, I had no other options. I made the right choice when I ordered it from you!

Business Plan

August 5, 2021

I was also satisfied with the service. Usually, I write everything by myself, but this time ( I have no idea how it happens!) I missed the deadline. My writer was very responsible, wrote the essay quickly, and kept the instructions. Nice to know that such experts exist!

Annotated Bibliography

August 5, 2021

It is really affordable! The prices start from 9$, which is an excellent proposal on the market. Recently I worked with another service that took much more money and provided lower quality papers.

Research proposal

August 5, 2021

I am absolutely satisfied. I am first timer here. Revision was made quickly, and the author met my expectations. Thanks a lot. Paper is phenomenal.

Essay (any type)

August 5, 2021

Having heard a lot of negative reviews about such services, I was a bit skeptical. However, our cooperation with Doctor My Essay was without pitfalls. I made two comments about the final work, and they re-wrote some parts very promptly. I am satisfied and will turn to them in the future.

Research paper

August 5, 2021

It was my first experience in online ordering, and I was a bit nervous. However, this was for nothing. I’ve got a high mark!

Dissertation

August 5, 2021

I understand that buying essays is a doubtful thing. You don’t put effort, don’t represent your ideas… However, I don’t perceive Doctor My Essay as a standard service. They don’t sell papers. They share high expertise!

Coursework

August 5, 2021

According to my previous experience, this service is really the best. They support the client and have competitive writers. I give them a perfect score!

Admission Essay

August 5, 2021

Nice service! It is cool that you can use the calculator on the main page and understand the price policy. For me, it is a huge plus!

Discussion Essay

August 5, 2021

Thanks to God I found this service! If I didn’t send my research to the teacher on time, he would eat me. I tell you! However, with doctor my essay service, I met the deadline, and I am still alive.

Report

August 5, 2021

Your service is excellent! Convenient and not expensive. Thanks for that!

Essay (any type)

August 5, 2021

If you have problems with time management, just like me, you need to cooperate with Doctor My Essay. Once you registered and made the order, you understand how easier it makes your life! Everything is online: ordering, communication… You can control the process everywhere and be sure that an expert will provide a high-level paper.

Cyber ethics | Computer Science homework help

Calculate the price of your order

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Free-revision policy

Privacy policy

Fair-cooperation guarantee