|
School of Economics Undergraduate assessment brief |
---|
Unit: |
|
---|---|
Assessment’s contribution to unit: |
|
Release Date: |
|
Submission Date: Feedback Date: |
ECON10004 35% of the final grade for the unit 17/11/2023 11:00 UK time15/12/2023 11:00 UK time22/01/2024 |
This is a piece of COURSEWORK that contributes to your Unit mark and you can:
Please remember this is a formal assessment and you should behave in a manner consistent with our values. This means
We are assessing your knowledge and understanding of the concepts and models covered in the course to date, and your ability to apply the material learned in a critical way. You should not rely on AI tools such as ChatGPT to generate your answers. If we suspect that your answers have been generated in this way, you will be investigated under the contract cheating process for failing to meet the learning objectives for this assessment.
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
“As of August 2019, 50 jurisdictions levied taxes on soft drinks, many of which have been implemented in the past couple of years… The majority of taxes on soft drinks apply to drinks containing added sugar. Such taxes aim to reduce sugar consumption by increasing the price of sugary drinks, which is likely to lead to a reduction in purchases and a commensurate reduction in consumption. A tax may also lead to reductions in sugar consumption through other channels; for example, due to product reformulation to lower sugar content, or by conveying information about the health costs of sugar consumption. The strength of these effects depends on how the tax is structured, as well as how people and firms respond to the tax.”
Griffith et al. (2019), The evidence on the effects of soft drinks taxes, IFS
In the UK, a soft drinks tax for sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs) was introduced in 2018. For drinks containing 5g or more sugar per litre, the rate is 18p tax per litre sold; for drinks containing 8g or more sugar per 100ml, the tax is 24p per litre sold. The tax is paid by the manufacturer. Other countries such as Italy are planning to introduce similar taxes.
Task: Assume you are working for a country which has not imposed a soft drinks levy before. Write a short policy report to inform government policymakers about how firms producing SSBs may respond to the introduction of a soft drinks levy, focusing in particular on the effects of the tax on price and sales. For your baseline answer, assume that firms are unable to reformulate their products to reduce sugar content. Additionally, discuss how your analysis would differ if companies had the option to substitute sugar with alternative sweeteners.
Your report must not exceed 1500 words in total and it must comply with the further guidance on content and structure below.
In your answer you must draw on the following economic concepts and models:
You can use additional material introduced in this unit where appropriate.
Your report should not exceed 1500 words in total and it should consist of three parts:
Work will be marked in line with the university marking criteria (which can be found at the end of this brief). This work will be marked with a particular focus on:
You can find the grade descriptors for each criterion for this assessment on the penultimate page of this brief.
Penalties for late work
Assignments handed in after the deadline, without a pre-arranged extension will be subject to the following penalty:
Penalties for work over the maximum word count
You are expected to include a word-count on the first page of the assignment. Footnotes should be avoided.
If you are found to have put an inaccurate word-count on your submission, a penalty of 5 marks may be imposed, over and above the penalties below:
Assessment exceeds word limit by up to (percentage of maximum) |
Penalty deducted from intellectual mark |
---|---|
5% |
5 marks |
10% |
10 marks |
15% |
15 marks |
20% |
20 marks |
25% |
30 marks |
More than 25% |
Mark of zero applied |
For example, for a 2,000 word assignment, if a student handed in a piece of work consisting of 2,050 words, your mark would be reduced by 5 marks. This is because the piece of work is between 0% and 5% over the maximum limit.
Academic Integrity
In academic writing, plagiarism is the inclusion of any idea or any language from someone else without giving due credit by citing and referencing that source in your work. This applies if the source is print or electronic, published or unpublished, another student’s work, or any other person.
The University’s Examination Regulations state that “Any thesis, dissertation, essay, or other course work must be the student’s own work and must not contain plagiarised material. Any instance of plagiarism in such coursework will be treated as an offence under these regulations.” (Section 3.1).
The
Examination Regulations give information on the University’s procedures for dealing with cases of plagiarism in undergraduate programmes (Section 4)
More information about plagiarism, and how to avoid it is available from the
Library website.
Fail (<40) |
3rd (40-49) |
2.2 (50-59) |
2.1 (60-69) |
1st (70+) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Correct Economics (70%) |
Flawed understanding and knowledge of the subject, often with little understanding of the question. | Evidence of study and comprehension of what has been taught, but grasp insecure. Able to apply the basic concepts, but there are substantial errors. | Evidence of study and comprehension of what has been taught, but grasp insecure. Able to apply most standard concepts, but there may be some errors or omissions. | Evidence of study and comprehension, and synthesis beyond the bounds of what has been taught. Able to apply most standard concepts, and some advanced concepts, but there may be some minor errors or minor omissions. | Evidence of study and originality, combined with evaluation and synthesis well beyond the bounds of what has been taught. Able to apply standard concepts, and select appropriate advanced concepts without error. |
Communication (25%) |
Sections have large parts of the narrative not well tailored to the target audience. Large parts of the text are difficult to follow. | Structure may no be entirely clear or logical. Sections have parts of the narrative not well tailored to the target audience, making some parts of the text difficult to follow. | Structure of argument is mostly clear but some sections are not entirely logical. Each section is generally understandable for the target audience, but at times could be better explained and provide better balance of technical terms and intuition. | Logical, clear structure making the argument easy to follow. Each section is appropriate for the target audience. Largely accurate use of technical language, only occasionally lacks precision or intuition. | Logical, clear structure making the argument easy to follow. Each section is appropriate for the target audience. Accurate use of technical language and excellent supporting intuition. |
Presentation (5%) |
Graphs/diagrams/notation difficult to read. Referencing attempted but is informal with a number of inconsistencies, or referencing is largely absent. |
Some graphs/diagrams/notation difficult to read. Attempts formal referencing but a number of inconsistencies. |
Graphs/diagrams/notation easy to read with a clear attempt to integrate them into the argument. Formal referencing style used appropriately with some inconsistencies. |
Graphs/diagrams/notation easy to read and mostly effectively integrated into the argument. Formal referencing style used appropriately. |
Graphs/diagrams/notation easy to read and effectively integrated into the argument. Formal referencing style used appropriately |
Note: Because the marking criteria consider a number of dimensions, it is unlikely that a single piece of work fits nicely into all of the descriptions above. For example, a piece of work may have excellent presentation, but due to significant errors, and major deficiencies, the piece of work may still be awarded a fail mark.
Fail (<40) |
3rd (40-49) |
2.2 (50-59) |
2.1 (60-69) |
1st (70+) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attainment of Learning Outcomes |
Attainment of only a minority of the learning outcomes. | Limited attainment of intended learning outcomes | Some limitations in attainment of learning objectives but has managed to grasp most of them. | Attained all the intended learning outcomes for a unit. | Excellent range and depth of attainment of intended learning outcomes. |
Application of Methods |
Able to demonstrate a clear but limited use of some of the basic methods and techniques taught. | Able to use a proportion of the basic methods and techniques taught. | Able to use most of the methods and techniques taught. | Able to use well a range of methods and techniques to come to conclusions. | Mastery of a wide range of methods and techniques |
Analysis, Comprehension and Synthesis |
Weak and incomplete grasp of what has been taught. | Evidence of study and comprehension of what has been taught, but grasp insecure. | Evidence of study and comprehension of what has been taught | Evidence of study, comprehension, and synthesis beyond the bounds of what has been explicitly taught. | Evidence of study and originality, combined with evaluation and synthesis of material clearly beyond the bounds of what has been taught. |
Technical Mastery |
For technical material, students may be able to apply a limited number of basic concepts, with significant errors | For technical material, students will be able to apply basic concepts, but there may be some substantial errors | For technical material, students will be able to apply most standard concepts, but with some errors or major omissions. | For technical material, students will be able to apply most standard concepts, and some advanced concepts but there may be some errors or minor omissions | For technical material, students will be able to apply all standard concepts, and select appropriate advanced concepts; errors will normally be few and minor in impact |
Evaluation/Critical Analysis |
Deficient understanding of the issues and concepts underlying the techniques and material taught. | Some grasp of the issues and concepts underlying the techniques and material taught, but weak and incomplete | Some grasp of issues and concepts underlying the techniques and material taught | Able to employ critical analysis and judgement of the techniques and material taught | Able to display a command of critical analysis and judgement of the techniques and material taught |
Quality of presentation |
Poor presentation | Poor presentation | Adequate presentation | Very good presentation | Excellent presentation |
Note: Because the marking criteria consider a number of dimensions, it is unlikely that a single piece of work fits nicely into all of the descriptions above. For example, a piece of work may have excellent presentation, but due to significant errors, and major deficiencies, the piece of work may still be awarded a fail mark.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more