Required Assigned Topic for the focus of your paper.
• Person with Asthma OR breathing issues. Note: You will use the same scenario you developed and same mHealth app you identified in Week 2.
Requirements and Guidelines
- Download the required Milestone 2 Template. (Links to an external site.) Save it to your computer with the file name: Your Last Name NR361 Milestone 2.docx.
- Briefly state the patient scenario from the Milestone 1 assignment.
- Include revisions, if required by Milestone 1 faculty feedback.
- Identify (3) teaching areas to improve patient outcomes.
- Information to be taught to patient should include information about the mHealth app, safety, guidelines, and how to interpret and act on the information that is provided.
- Describe 3 ways you would determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app.
- Remember to cite when appropriate
- You are required to complete the form using the productivity tools required , which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.)
- Carefully review the grading rubric criteria for Milestone 2 and type directly on your saved Milestone 2 Template.
- Complete all rubric areas for a superior Milestone 2.
- Use instructor feedback from Milestone 1 to improve your statements regarding the patient scenario in Milestone 2.
NR361 Milestone 2NR361 Milestone 2CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefine: Approved Patient Scenario from Milestone 1Brief statement of the patient scenario from the Milestone 1 assignment, including revisions if required by Milestone 1 faculty feedback.30.0 ptsDefines (states) the brief patient scenario approved from Milestone 1 including excellent details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor feedback).26.0 ptsDefines (states) the brief patient scenario from Milestone 1 including good details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor feedback).24.0 ptsDefines (states) the brief patient scenario approved from Milestone 1 including fair details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor feedback).12.0 ptsDefinition of brief patient scenario is poorly done and/or revisions did not adhere to feedback from instructor on Milestone 10.0 ptsDoes not define (state) the nursing issue.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeach:Identify (3) teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Information to be taught to patient should include information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines, and how to interpret and act on the information that is provided. Remember to use bullet points.75.0 ptsIdentifies 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Excellent details includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, and how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Written in bullet points.66.0 pts
Identifies 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Good details includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, and how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Written in bullet points.60.0 ptsIdentifies 2 or 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Fair data includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, and/or how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Does not use bullet points or information is not clear.29.0 ptsIdentifies 1-2 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Poor data includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, OR how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Does not use bullet points AND information is not clear.0.0 ptsDid not identify teaching measures to improve patient outcomes.75.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate:Describe 3 ways you would determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Cite when appropriate. Remember to use bullet points.75.0 ptsDescribe in excellent detail 3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Written in bullet points.66.0 ptsDescribes in good detail 3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Written in bullet points.60.0 ptsDescribes in fair detail 2-3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. May not use bullet points or information is not clear.29.0 ptsDescribes in poor detail 1-2 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Does not use bullet points AND information is not clear.0.0 ptsDid not identify ways to evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app.75.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations and References:Include citations and references for the mHealth application in APA format and a scholarly peer-reviewed journal article related to the patient scenario published within the past 5 years.30.0 ptsExcellent citations and references in APA format for both the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal that is less than 5 years old26.0 ptsGood citations and references with minor errors in APA format for both/either the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal that is less than 5 years old24.0 ptsCitations and references with some errors in APA format for both/either the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal that is less than 5 years old12.0 ptsCitations and references with numerous errors in APA format for the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal.0.0 ptsDid not cite or reference in APA format.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritingcontains no spelling or grammatical errors. Reading level is appropriate for patient described.15.0 ptsGrammar, punctuation, and spelling are correct; Reading level appropriate for patient.13.0 ptsGood mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column12.0 ptsFair mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column.6.0 ptsPoor mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column0.0 ptsVery poor mechanics such that assignment is difficult to read.15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrect Topic and correct Template Use0.0 pts0 points deductedCorrect topic and correct template used for the assignment0.0 pts22.5 points deducted (10%)Incorrect topic OR incorrect/no template used results in a 22.5 point deduction (10%).0.0 pts