Good job on this paper. Your description of selected disorder is clear, insightful, and accurate. Identification of DSM-IV-TR diagnostic category for the disorder is present, clear and accurate. Your explanation of treatment of the disorder is clear, astute, thorough, and reasonable. Well done.
Prof. Vic was on-time.... merci
Good job on this paper. Your description of selected disorder is clear, insightful, and accurate. Identification of DSM-V diagnostic category for the disorder is present, clear and accurate to a point. Your explanation of treatment of the disorder is clear, astute, thorough, and reasonable.
Would give 0 stars if I could. He sent me pictures of a piece of paper he had written on!?!?! Opening a dispute and I want my money back!
Very pleased with Professor Victor work.
Not what I was looking for!!
I felt you did a good job identifying and analyzing the theoretical and practical challenges in defining what is abnormal. You presented your ideas in a logical and neatly organized structure. Your paper endorsed your concept of the topic, but there are a few APA errors in your writing that interrupted the flow. I hope this feedback helps.
its very good and i got good grate on it
Good job on this paper. Your description of selected disorder is clear, insightful, and accurate. Identification of DSM-IV-TR diagnostic category for the disorder is present, clear and accurate. Your explanation of treatment of the disorder is clear, astute, thorough, and reasonable. Well done.
Prof. Vic was on-time.... merci
Good job on this paper. Your description of selected disorder is clear, insightful, and accurate. Identification of DSM-V diagnostic category for the disorder is present, clear and accurate to a point. Your explanation of treatment of the disorder is clear, astute, thorough, and reasonable.
Would give 0 stars if I could. He sent me pictures of a piece of paper he had written on!?!?! Opening a dispute and I want my money back!
Very pleased with Professor Victor work.
Not what I was looking for!!
I felt you did a good job identifying and analyzing the theoretical and practical challenges in defining what is abnormal. You presented your ideas in a logical and neatly organized structure. Your paper endorsed your concept of the topic, but there are a few APA errors in your writing that interrupted the flow. I hope this feedback helps.
its very good and i got good grate on it