How does Ju/’hoansi social organization relate to the subsistence pattern of hunting and collecting?  How is Ju/’hoansi society likely to change as the foraging way of life erode?

You may prepare you essay using your class notes, websites listed below,books and your word processing program. Enter the exam and paste in your response. I have set the exam/essay to maximum time (12 hours), this should give you plenty of time to edit your work. You will only be able to enter the exam/essay once. A possible solution – or key points for your essay – will be displayed in the grade book. The essay is not auto-graded. Your essay should be detailed and include terminology from the textbook relating to anthropology.  Your essay should be approximately 2 pages in length.

Website on the Ju/hoansi

http://www.der.org/kalfam/brief-history-of-change.html

KEY POINTS FOR THE ESSAY WILL INCLUDE:

*These foragers obtain their diet in an average workweek of about 20 hours.

*Their lives are rich in human warmth and aesthetic experience.

*They are able to balance work, love, ritual and play.

*They are often called by anthropologist the original affluent society.

*They depend on the mongongo nut and keep to fairly fixed annual nomadic routes.

*Their groups are small in number.

*Exhaustion of local food resources, conflicts, and desires to visit relatives can break up a group.

*Redistribution of people is essential to their survival.

Please note the following Rubrics that I will be using to grade this session 
Rubrics for Essay Discussion Questions 20 points Content/Explanation = 75% 
Word Count if there is a word count required of 250 words
225 – 249 = -2 points 
200 – 224 = -3 points 
175 – 199 = -4 points 
150 – 174 = -5 points 
125 – 149 = -6 points 
100 – 124 = -7 points 
50 – 99 = -8.5 points 
less than 50 = -12 points 
Explanation – Has the student sufficiently explained their ideas? Does the essay or the comment contain pertinent dates, details and specifics?

Good explanation – all questions answered and statements explained, all dates details and specifics included= full credit 
Good/fair explanation – student answers most questions and explains most statements/ideas but leaves some unexplained, some dates included but not all events have a specific date = – 2 points 
Fair/good – student answers some questions and explains statements/ideas, but leaves most unexplained, most events do not have a date included = -4 points 
Needs Improvement – student answers maybe one of the questions, gives basic ideas and does not explain the ideas, most specifics and dates left out = -6 points 
Not Satisfactory – student answers maybe one of the questions, gives basic ideas and does not explain the ideas, no dates or details are included = -10 points 
Grammar 
1-2 errors = -1 point 
3-5 errors = -3 points 
5+ errors = -5 points 
Late post = 10% deduction per day 
Plagiarism? Plagiarizing can result in an automatic 0 for the weekly discussion forum assignment. 
If you are taking information from a source, make sure that you cite it.