Nurs6341 discussion response #4: analyzing patient risk

NURS6341 Discussion Response #4: Analyzing Patient Risk

 

Respond to the discussion #4 below using the following approach:

  1. Offer and support an additional strategy a colleague might use to integrate the principle of stacking into his or her specialty of interest.
  2. Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.
  3. Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.

 

 

Discussion #4

 

As the acuity level of our patient’s health status increased, the complexity of our roles increases also.  Attempting to manage multiple patients with complex health statuses requires the nurse to develop a care giving rubric that allows for this complex decision making process to occur seamlessly, with no harm coming to our patients. As novice nurses this task can seem daunting and overwhelming at times, but as we process through our career, the clinical decision making matrix becomes much easier to perform. One of those decision-making matrixes is stacking.

Stacking is an RN cognitive process involving decision-making about workflow priorities (Shirey, Ebright, & McDaniel, 2013).  Stacking as an important strategy used by experienced RNs for management of the complexity surrounding nursing care which involves complex reasoning and clinical decision making.

My clinical setting for my example is the Operating Room (OR) of a large hospital. As OR nurses, it can be overwhelming even for a seasoned OR nurse to understand, and prioritize this complex, multifaceted environment.  Being a high pressure environment, the OR can be a very fast-paced, stressful place. Surgeons’ tempers can run high, and that can trickle down to the staff, placing more emphasis on creating smooth running process, by the OR RN. Eskola et al. (2016) noted that the OR can be a stressful practice environment, where nurses might have either job stress or job satisfaction based on their competence.

In my clinical example, the building was built in the early 1900’s with many, many additions over the years.  In the Operating Rooms suites, their locations were scattered on 3 different wings of the hospital, and on 2 different floors.  In addition, the Central Supply, which sterilized and stored the surgical instruments and disposable supplies, was located in the basement of the original building, requiring multiple elevators trips to gather supplies. Also, the elevators were not dedicated to the OR’s, but were general use elevators, which made timely delivery of supplies problematic.

In this environment, the OR nurse needed to be very skilled in stacking, as regards to equipment and supply prioritization and optimization of use.  In today’s hospital culture of, “just in time” supply delivery, many hospital items are not stocked in large quantities and so amassing of large quantities of possibly needed equipment and supplies was frowned upon.  The prioritization skills of the novice nurse would have been taxed as even the more experienced nurses found the ability to have the correct supplies, in the correct quantities, in addition to planning for the unforeseen issues, daunting in the best of circumstances, and overwhelming in the worst of situations. Yildiz Findik, Ozbas, Cavdar, Yildizeli Topcu, & Onler (2015), remarked that the nursing students generally employed a helpless/self-accusatory approach among passive patterns as their clinical stress levels increased, and those who had never been to an operating room previously used a submissive approach among passive patterns.

In this environment, emphasis must be placed on the prioritization decisions in preparing and stocking supplies, and in the relationship management with the physicians.  For example, in cultivating a high relationship management technique with the operating the physicians, the OR nurse was better able to anticipate needs and have the correct items available, when they were needed. Patterson, Ebright, & Saleem (2011) said that in particular, being proactive on certain tasks was believed to reduce the overall amount of time spent on them. Being proactive in the OR environment requires a certain level of self confidence in the ability to communicate information quickly, concisely and accurately.  

 

 

References

Eskola, S., Roos, M., McCormack, B., Slater, P., Hahtela, N., & Suominen, T. (2016). Workplace culture among operating room nurses. Journal of Nursing Management24(6), 725-734. doi:10.1111/jonm.12376

 

 

Patterson, E. S., Ebright, P. R., & Saleem, J. J. (2011). Investigating stacking: How do registered nurses prioritize their activities in real-time? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics41(4), 389-393. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2011.01.012

 

Shirey, m. r., Ebright, p. r., & McDaniel, a. m. (2013). Nurse manager cognitive decision-making amidst stress and work complexity. Journal of Nursing Management, 21(1), 17-30. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01380.x

 

Yildiz Findik, U., Ozbas, A., Cavdar, I., Yildizeli Topcu, S., & Onler, E. (2015). Assessment of nursing students’ stress levels and coping strategies in operating room practice. Nurse Education in Practice15(3), 192-195. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2014.11.008

 

 

 

Reminder:

1.    1 page only

2.    Put Citations in APA format and  at least 3 references… Articles must be 2011 to 2016.

 

 

Required Readings

 

Ebright, P. R. (2010). The complex work of RNs: Implications for healthy work environments. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 15(1)

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

 

The author, an expert nurse, examines the meaning of “complexity” in nursing practice, how complexity impacts safety, quality, and retention, and considers recommendations and solutions for addressing complexity to reduce nursing stress and improve patient care.

Duffield, C., Diers, D., O’Brien-Pallas, L., Aisbett, C., Roche, M., King, M., & Aisbett, K. (2011). Nursing staffing, nursing workload, the work environment and patient outcomes. Applied Nursing Research, 24(4), 244–255.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

 

This article details a study that links nurse staffing issues, increased workload, and unstable nursing unit environments with negative patient outcomes, including falls and medication errors, on medical/surgical units. As you read, compare the concept of nursing workload and nursing complexity and consider solutions in the Ebright article that might apply.

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2013). Addressing complexity of nursing practice [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu.

 

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 8 minutes.

 

In this video segment, Dr. Pat Ebright and Dr. Mary Sitterding discuss complexities of nursing practice. Specifically, they highlight how the principle of stacking can help both novice and experienced nurses to make key workload decisions in the clinical environment.

 

Accessible player 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2013). The role of the nurse educator [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu.

 

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 9 minutes.

 

In this video segment, Dr. Pat Ebright and Dr. Mary Sitterding discuss the role of the nurse educator.

 

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more