Rubric: Reflec on for Monitor and Adjust – Gonzalez and Saavedra

Scoring and
Scale Proficient (15 points) Developing (10 points)

Needs Improvement (0
points)

Adjusting
instruction and
activities

Reflection demonstrates a deep
understanding of how both
teachers skillfully adapt instruction
and activities to meet students’
needs, supported by specific and
relevant examples.

Reflection acknowledges the
importance of adjusting
instruction and activities, but
lacks specific examples or
connections.

Reflection does not show
an understanding of
adjusting instruction and
activities based on
classroom needs.

Monitoring
student
engagement

Reflection provides a
comprehensive analysis of how
both teachers effectively keep
students engaged through various
strategies, with clear and
illustrative examples.

Reflection mentions
strategies to maintain
engagement, but lacks
specific or detailed instances
to illustrate the point.

Reflection does not
address strategies or
methods for monitoring
student engagement.

Monitor and
adjust based on
student feedback

Reflection thoroughly discusses
how both teachers collect and
apply student feedback to enhance
the learning experience, citing
specific examples of adjustments
made.

Reflection acknowledges the
role of student feedback but
lacks clear examples or
explanations of how it
impacts instructional
adjustments.

Reflection does not show
an understanding of using
student feedback to
monitor and adjust
instruction.

Similarities and
differences
between the two
classrooms

Reflection thoughtfully compares
and contrasts classroom cultures
and collaboration, highlighting key
points of similarity and difference
with specific examples.

Reflection identifies some
commonalities and
distinctions between the
classrooms, but lacks depth
in discussion or specific
examples.

Reflection does not
effectively compare or
contrast classroom
cultures and collaboration