Criteria
|
Excellent
18 points
|
Very Good
17 points
|
Good
15 points
|
Fair
13 points
|
Poor
9 points
|
Not Acceptable or Missing
0 points
|
Criterion Score
|
Introduction and Thesis
|
Excellent introduction and thesis statement.
|
Very good introduction and thesis statement. Missing 1 or 2 minor details.
|
Good introduction and thesis statement. Missing several minor details.
|
Fair introduction and thesis statement. Missing some major details.
|
Poor introduction and thesis statement. Many major details missing.
|
Introduction and/or thesis statement is not understandable
-or-
No introduction or thesis statement
|
Score of Introduction and Thesis,
/ 18
|
Significance of the Topic
|
Excellent statement of the significance and relevance of the topic.
|
Very good statement of the significance and relevance of the topic. Missing 1 or 2 minor details.
|
Good statement of the significance and relevance of the topic, with several minor details missing.
|
Fair statement of the significance and relevance of the topic, with some major details missing.
|
Difficult to understand or insufficient statement of the significance and relevance of the topic.
|
Significance of the topic is not addressed.
|
Score of Significance of the Topic,
/ 18
|
Theoretical Background
|
Excellent and comprehensive discussion of theoretical background related to the topic
|
Very good discussion of the theoretical background related to the topic, with 1-2 minor details missing
|
Good discussion of the theoretical background related to the topic, with several minor details missing
|
Fair discussion of the theoretical background related to the topic, with several major details missing
|
Poor discussion of the theoretical background related to the topic, with many minor details missing
|
Response is not understandable
-or-
No discussion of theoretical background
|
Score of Theoretical Background,
/ 18
|
Current Research
|
Excellent incorporation of at least 10 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research.
Sources are primarily scholarly academic sources and examine social determinant effects.
|
Effectively incorporates 8-9 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research.
May have 1 or 2 nonacademic sources, but uses a number of scholarly academic sources.
|
Effectively incorporates 6-7 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research.
May have 1 or 2 nonacademic sources, but uses a few scholarly academic sources.
|
Effectively incorporates 4-5 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research.
May have 1 or 2 nonacademic sources, but uses a few scholarly academic sources.
|
Effectively incorporates 1-3 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research.
May rely almost exclusively on nonacademic sources.
|
Does not incorporate any recent, credible, and relevant sources that examine current research
-or-
No discussion of current research
|
Score of Current Research,
/ 18
|
Role of Public Policy
|
Excellent and comprehensive discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic
|
Very good discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic, with 1-2 minor details missing
|
Good discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic, with several minor details missing
|
Fair discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic, with several major details missing
|
Poor discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic, with major details missing
|
Response is not understandable
-or-
No discussion of the role of public policy
|
Score of Role of Public Policy,
/ 18
|
Proposal of an Evidence-Based Policy
|
Excellent and comprehensive proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults
|
Very good proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults, with 1-2 minor details missing
|
Good proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults, with several minor details missing
|
Fair proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults, with several major details missing
|
Poor proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults, with many major details missing
|
Response is not understandable
-or-
No proposal presented
|
Score of Proposal of an Evidence-Based Policy,
/ 18
|
Conclusion
|
Excellent conclusion that effectively summarizes the main points of the paper, highlights the importance of the work and suggests future directions.
|
Very good conclusion that effectively summarizes the main points of the paper and highlights the importance of the work and suggests future directions. Missing 1 or 2 minor details.
|
Good conclusion that summarizes the main points of the paper and highlights the importance of the work and suggests future directions. Missing several minor details.
|
Fair conclusion that summarizes the main points of the paper but is missing several major details.
|
Poor conclusion that does not effectively summarize the main points of the paper and is missing many major details.
|
Response is not understandable
-or-
No conclusion
|
Score of Conclusion,
/ 18
|
Criteria
|
Excellent
12 points
|
Very Good
11 points
|
Good
10 points
|
Fair
8 points
|
Poor
6 points
|
Not Acceptable or Missing
0 points
|
Criterion Score
|
Writing Quality
|
Very well-written.
There are no mechanical or grammatical errors.
|
There are very few mechanical or grammatical errors.
|
There are several minor mechanical or grammatical errors.
|
There are several major mechanical or grammatical errors.
|
There are many major mechanical or grammatical errors that impact readability.
|
Response is not understandable
-or-
No submission
|
Score of Writing Quality,
/ 12
|
APA Citations and Formatting
|
There are no errors in APA citation or formatting.
|
There are 1-2 minor errors in citation or formatting.
|
There are several minor errors in citation or formatting.
|
There are several major errors in citation or formatting.
|
There are many major errors in citation or formatting.
|
Citations are missing
-and/or-
No attempt at formatting
|
Score of APA Citations and Formatting,
/ 12
|