71. Dary Co. Produces a single product. Its normal selling price is $28 per unit. The variable costs are $18 per unit. Fixed costs are $20,000 for a normal production run of 5,000 units per month. Dary received a request for a special order that would not interfere with normal sales. The order was for 1,500 units and a special price of $17.50 per unit. […]
134. The inventory at April 1, 2007, and the costs charged to Work in Process–Department B during April for Barley Company are as follows: 500 units, 60% completed$ 3,460 From Department A, 10,000 units36,300 Direct labor7,960 Factory overhead12,500 During April, all direct materials are transferred from Department A, the units in process at April 1 were completed, and of the 10,000 units entering the department, all […]
61. Which of the following is not an adjustment when arriving at net cash provided by operating activities under the indirect method? A. Noncash expenses such as depreciation expense B. Gains and losses on the sale of long-term assets C. Changes in noncash current asset and current liability accounts D. Changes in a company’s long-term assets 62. Under the direct method, which of the following would not be included in […]
24.3 Learning Objective 24-3 1) When preparing an income statement showing departmental contribution margin: A) indirect expenses are combined with direct expenses. B) indirect departmental expenses are added to contribution margin. C) direct expenses are subtracted from gross profit of a department. D) None of these answers is correct. 2) Compute the contribution margin for the video department, when gross profit is $970,000, direct […]
91. Which of the following statements regarding the debt to equity ratio is correct? A. A high ratio means that the company is primarily financed through stockholder investments. B. A higher ratio is preferred. C. It is a measure of a company’s ability to pay its debt. D. It is a measure of investor and creditor risk. 92. On July 1, 2011, immediately after recording interest payments, Salsa, Inc. retired […]
141. The board of directors declared cash dividends totaling $242,000 during the current year. The comparative balance sheet indicates dividends payable of $48,000 at the beginning of the year and $59,000 at the end of the year. What was the amount of cash payments to stockholders during the year? 142. An analysis of the general ledger accounts indicates that equipment, which had cost $148,000 and on […]
31. Which of the following items will be found in a corporate annual report? A. Industry standards B. Notes to the financial statements C. Selected financial data from non-competitor companies D. Management’s statement on auditors responsibility for the financial statements. 32. Which one of the following items is least likely to be found in a corporate annual report? A. Notes to the financial statements B. Internal budget reports C. Auditor’s report […]
111. Spirit Company, a merchandiser, recently completed the 2013 calendar year. For the year, (1) all sales are credit sales, (2) all credits to Accounts Receivable reflect cash receipts from customers, (3) all purchases of inventory are on credit, (4) all debits to Accounts Payable reflect cash payments for inventory, and (5) Other Expenses are paid in advance and are initially debited to Prepaid […]
15) FILLO, Inc.’s inventory activity in May 2011 was as follows: Inventory, May 1 100 units @ $8 each Purchase, May 7 300 units @ $6 each Sale, May 18 250 units @ $15 each Part A: Record the effect of the above inventory activity on the accounting equation assuming perpetual weighted average cost is used. Shareholders’ equity Transactions in May, 2011: […]
33. Disneyland is one of several theme parks owned by The Walt Disney Company. Disneyland should be evaluated as: A. An investment center. B. A cost center. C. An entertainment center. D. A profit center (other than an investment center). 34. Disneyland charges visitors for admission to the park but not for individual rides or attractions. “Splash Mountain” is one of the rides in Disneyland. The Walt […]
The dissemination of EBP results serves multiple important roles. Sharing results makes the case for your decisions. It also adds to the body of knowledge, which creates opportunities for future practitioners. By presenting results, you also become an advocate for EBP, creating a culture within your organization or beyond that informs, educates, and promotes the effective use of EBP.
To Prepare:
To Complete:
Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project.
Articles
Membrive-Jiménez, M. J., Pradas-Hernández, L., Suleiman-Martos, N., Vargas-Román, K., Cañadas-De la Fuente, G. A., Gomez-Urquiza, J. L., & De la Fuente-Solana, E. I. (2020). Burnout in Nursing Managers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Related Factors, Levels and Prevalence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11). https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.3390/ijerph17113983
Chiara Dall’Ora, Jane Ball, Maria Reinius, & Peter Griffiths. (2020). Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. Human Resources for Health, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9
Adams, A., Hollingsworth, A., & Osman, A. (2019). The Implementation of a Cultural Change Toolkit to Reduce Nursing Burnout and Mitigate Nurse Turnover in the Emergency Department. JEN: Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(4), 452.
Suleiman-Martos, N., Gomez-Urquiza, J. L., Aguayo-Estremera, R., Cañadas-De La Fuente, G. A., De La Fuente-Solana, E. I., & Albendín-García, L. (2020). The effect of mindfulness training on burnout syndrome in nursing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Of Advanced Nursing. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1111/jan.14318
Professor's Feedback
Nice title slide.
Slide 2: "They aspire..." "Their vision...." "Their mission...." WHO is "they/their"?
The current problem is not completely defined. There are no notes pages. Scope of the problem is not clearly defined. There are only two sources listed-what about the four studies that should be critiqued here?
For the tables, share results not process. What did you learn about your topic specifically from the tables? This is the evidence to support the change you want to make.
The elements required are incomplete. Be sure to review the rubric each week, and to fully describe and discuss as required. Thanks for your hard work this week. I appreciate your efforts. I look forward to more information next week.
RUBRIC
Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project:
· Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.
· Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.--
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 81 (81.00%) - 90 (90.00%)The narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the evidence-based project.
The narrated presentation accurately and clearly explains in detail how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples.
The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides a justification that details the selection of this dissemination strategy that is fully supported by specific and relevant examples.
The narrated presentation provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation.Good 72 (72.00%) - 80 (80.00%)The narrated presentation adequately summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the evidence-based project.
The narrated presentation accurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; some specific examples may be provided.
The narrated presentation accurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by specific examples.
The narrated presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation.Fair 63 (63.00%) - 71 (71.00%)The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the evidence-based project.
The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; inaccurate or vague examples may be provided.
The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by inaccurate or vague examples.
The narrated presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 62 (62.00%)The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the evidence-based project or is missing. The narrated presentation is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the evidence-based project or is missing.
The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, no examples are provided, or it is missing.
The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy, no examples are provided, or it is missing.
The narrated presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained or is missing. The presentation fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation.
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.--
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.Fair 3.5 (3.50%) - 3.5 (3.50%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.--
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%)Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Fair 3.5 (3.50%) - 3.5 (3.50%)Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%)Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more