71. Canadian Beer reported they sold equipment for $222 million cash and purchased $1,515 million of new equipment using cash. The equipment sold had a net book value of $150 million. Cash flow from investing activities would show A. an inflow of $222 million and outflow of $1,515 million. B. an inflow of $222 million and outflow of $150 million. C. cash paid for equipment of $1,293 million. […]
121. Inventory turnover ratio A. indicates how fast firms sell their inventory items. B. measured in terms of the rate of movement of goods into and out of the firm. C. equals cost of goods sold divided by the average inventory during the period. all of the above E. none of the above 122. Various techniques are used in the analysis of financial data to emphasize the comparative […]
41) Cartwright Custom Carpentry manufactures chairs in its Processing Department, and uses the FIFO cost flow assumption. Direct Materials are included at the inception of the production cycle and must be bundled in single kits for each unit. Conversion costs are incurred evenly throughout the production cycle. Inspection takes place as units are placed into production. After inspection some units are spoiled due to […]
91. A company’s income statement showed the following: net income, $124,000; depreciation expense, $30,000, and gain on sale of plant assets, $14,000. An examination of the company’s current assets and current liabilities showed the following changes as a result of operating activities: accounts receivable decreased $9,400; merchandise inventory increased $18,000; prepaid expenses decreased $6,200; accounts payable increased $3,400. Calculate the net cash provided or […]
151. The balanced scorecard measures financial and nonfinancial performance of a business. The balanced scorecard measures four areas. Identify one of the following that is not included as a performance measurement. A. Internal Process B. Financial C. Innovation and Learning D. Employees 152. The following is a measure of a manager’s performance working in an investment center. A. budget performance report B. rate of return and residual income measures C. divisional income statements […]
Multiple Choice Questions 31. A standard cost system may be used A. only with a process cost system. B. only with a job order cost system. C. with either a job order cost system or a process cost system. D. in neither a job order cost system or a process cost system. 32. Job order cost accounting is appropriate A. when there are continuous operations on standard types of […]
54) A hospital receives $1,000,000 monthly in funding from various sources. Annual fixed costs are projected to be $5,000,000 and the variable cost per patient, across all departments is projected to be $534.80. Last year they treated 11,500 patients. The hospital expects a 5% increase in patients this year. A governing bylaw requires that the hospital be run as a non-profit organization. What is […]
11.2 Identify the differences among relevant costs for short-term and long-term production output decisions. 1) All fixed costs are irrelevant in relevant-cost analysis. 2) All variable costs are relevant in relevant-cost analysis. 3) Insourcing is the process of producing goods and services within the firm rather than purchasing them from an outside supplier. 4) An example of an outsourcing process is […]
6) The budgeted indirect-cost rate for each cost pool is computed as ________. A) budgeted annual indirect costs divided by budgeted annual quantity of cost allocation base B) budgeted annual quantity of cost allocation base divided by budgeted annual indirect costs C) actual annual indirect costs divided by budgeted annual quantity of cost allocation base D) budgeted annual indirect costs divided by budgeted actual […]
1. On January 2, Well Corporation sold merchandise with a gross price of $140,000 to Priority Corporation with terms of 2/10, n/30. How much sales discounts would be recorded if payment was received on January 8? A. $ 2,800B. $ 0C. $ 137,200D. $ 140.000 2. Records Inc. received payment of a $20,000 accounts receivable within 10 days. The terms were 2/10, n/30. Records would show a: A. trade discount of $400.B. trade […]
The dissemination of EBP results serves multiple important roles. Sharing results makes the case for your decisions. It also adds to the body of knowledge, which creates opportunities for future practitioners. By presenting results, you also become an advocate for EBP, creating a culture within your organization or beyond that informs, educates, and promotes the effective use of EBP.
To Prepare:
To Complete:
Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project.
Articles
Membrive-Jiménez, M. J., Pradas-Hernández, L., Suleiman-Martos, N., Vargas-Román, K., Cañadas-De la Fuente, G. A., Gomez-Urquiza, J. L., & De la Fuente-Solana, E. I. (2020). Burnout in Nursing Managers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Related Factors, Levels and Prevalence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11). https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.3390/ijerph17113983
Chiara Dall’Ora, Jane Ball, Maria Reinius, & Peter Griffiths. (2020). Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. Human Resources for Health, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9
Adams, A., Hollingsworth, A., & Osman, A. (2019). The Implementation of a Cultural Change Toolkit to Reduce Nursing Burnout and Mitigate Nurse Turnover in the Emergency Department. JEN: Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(4), 452.
Suleiman-Martos, N., Gomez-Urquiza, J. L., Aguayo-Estremera, R., Cañadas-De La Fuente, G. A., De La Fuente-Solana, E. I., & Albendín-García, L. (2020). The effect of mindfulness training on burnout syndrome in nursing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Of Advanced Nursing. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1111/jan.14318
Professor's Feedback
Nice title slide.
Slide 2: "They aspire..." "Their vision...." "Their mission...." WHO is "they/their"?
The current problem is not completely defined. There are no notes pages. Scope of the problem is not clearly defined. There are only two sources listed-what about the four studies that should be critiqued here?
For the tables, share results not process. What did you learn about your topic specifically from the tables? This is the evidence to support the change you want to make.
The elements required are incomplete. Be sure to review the rubric each week, and to fully describe and discuss as required. Thanks for your hard work this week. I appreciate your efforts. I look forward to more information next week.
RUBRIC
Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project:
· Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.
· Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.--
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 81 (81.00%) - 90 (90.00%)The narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the evidence-based project.
The narrated presentation accurately and clearly explains in detail how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples.
The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides a justification that details the selection of this dissemination strategy that is fully supported by specific and relevant examples.
The narrated presentation provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation.Good 72 (72.00%) - 80 (80.00%)The narrated presentation adequately summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the evidence-based project.
The narrated presentation accurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; some specific examples may be provided.
The narrated presentation accurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by specific examples.
The narrated presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the dissemination strategy explained. The narrated presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation.Fair 63 (63.00%) - 71 (71.00%)The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the evidence-based project.
The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience; inaccurate or vague examples may be provided.
The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy and may be supported by inaccurate or vague examples.
The narrated presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 62 (62.00%)The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the evidence-based project or is missing. The narrated presentation is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the evidence-based project or is missing.
The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately explains how to disseminate the results of the project to an audience, no examples are provided, or it is missing.
The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately provides a justification for the selection of this dissemination strategy, no examples are provided, or it is missing.
The narrated presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the dissemination strategy explained or is missing. The presentation fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation.
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.--
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.Fair 3.5 (3.50%) - 3.5 (3.50%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.--
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%)Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Fair 3.5 (3.50%) - 3.5 (3.50%)Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Poor 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%)Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more